If it is your
view that the world, or rather the human part of it, has gone barking mad it is
fair to ask why. One reason could be
that what is called "management theory" has now been applied so
extensively and rigorously and in spheres to which it is alien that it is
leaving a trail of ruin and destruction behind it.
Jessica Duchen
gives a warning about what it proposed and a summary of how the Arts are intended
to be fitted in to the mathematical models and the algorithms by which we are
ruled, assessed, taxed, selected, deselected and the rest today.
This prime example she links to which tells of the extremes to which
it is put comes from Arts Professional who have cause to be concerned. The article which tries to simplify the issue
makes demanding reading and has to be longer than more blog readers like to
spell out what is involved. It is grim
stuff.
So many of us
ask for the arts to have some funding and support to ensure their survival and
continuance in a difficult world. Now it
seems that this can only be if extensive management is applied to the
distribution and assessment of those which are being assisted.
What might
result can only be guessed at. One
artist comes to mind, Rembrandt, who painted and drew a great many small
pictures, almost miniatures in a way, but which enable you to appreciate the
large wall sized masterpieces that we are more familiar with.
So which will
go in the bin? The smaller ones because
the relative cost per square inch does not meet the guidelines? Or the big ones which management think could
be digitised and shrunk to a size that can be handled by one person?
why give money to the arts at all?
ReplyDeleteLet them seek patronage if money they must have and exist they should.
"It is grim stuff."
ReplyDeleteIt is - bonkers too. We already have a sound metric for artistic merit - money. Will people pay for it? Remove all subsidies and find out.