Fifty years or so can be a
long while in terms of technology, think 1825 to 1875 or 1905 to 1955. If anything in the last fifty or so change
may have speeded up. This deep thinking
arises from watching the late 1960's film "The Italian Job" recorded
on the box.
If you do not know it,
Wikipedia has a decent item. It was a
caper film about a clever heist in Turin using cars released in 1969 in full
colour and starring Michael Caine and many of the famous faces of the day. It ends unresolved with a literal cliff
hanger, a bus rocking above a ravine at risk of falling.
Some things have not
changed. The gold price is still a key
economic item, there are problems with our Balance of Payments, on the roads
Mini-Coopers can still be seen as can examples of top end sports cars, although
very different items under the bonnet and much else, also they do not rust
quite so quickly.
One of the key features in
the film was the role of major computers in the control of Turin's traffic
systems. Much of this was fanciful and
in a sense futuristic. This computer was
housed in a huge block with teams of expert staff and a large banks of whirring
machines.
Yet the computer power in
such a system then was rather less than the Sky Box sitting under my TV, never
mind the TV itself and this do not compare to the capability of the little
laptop on which this item is being knocked out by a one unpaid person.
In the late 1960's the
vast majority of the population knew little about computers and were bemused by
what was alleged to be their function.
Many able people regarded them as glorified typewriters that would only
ever do the most mundane work albeit with a small number of higher functions
which had very restricted applications.
One of the great questions
is why the UK, which might have had a head start in the computer age and had
some priority or recognition of the wider potential were not at the
forefront. We did have experts and some
people with the ability but were well behind the game at the critical points of
time.
A reason, among many, is
that the state put its money behind other things which did not work out. This would be at the same time it was backing
declining industries and fixated on big companies while small business paid the
taxes and were hamstrung by both regulations and capital restrictions.
As in many areas of
business it was difficult to get started, more so to expand and real growth was
hit by a range of costs beyond those which others had to meet. There are many areas of manufacture that have
now gone, or almost. Along with this are
those which were never able to really grow as they should have done.
It is not getting any
better.
"There are many areas of manufacture that have now gone, or almost."
ReplyDeleteI think we'll regret that in the not too distant future.