In the
Guardian of Tuesday 30 May 2017, Rebecca Rideal has an item "Hilary Mantel
was right. Some academics dislike novelists. But why?" dealing with books
and scripts on historical topics, for which there is a large and varied
audience.
Clearly if an academic
feels that someone has taken their work or invaded their field of interest to
write a fiction that is imaginative, misunderstood or just plain tosh, they are
right to be annoyed. On the other hand if the basic tale is going to be of wide
interest then to be perfectly honest and reasonable it is going to happen.
But this
assumes, in any event, that the academic is right about either the facts of
history or what is derived or assumed from them. We are all familiar with
dramas in which the facts are true but only the names have been changed. What
if the names are the same but it is the facts that are being changed?
This in The History Blog of 30 May 2017 is an instructive item. As the
Professor says, "This is going to change a whole lot about our
understanding of the entire Bronze Age." It is not one thing. The science
is telling us more and more about the past and often it does not match up with
what we thought, assumed or guessed about the past.
Time and again
when going into the detail, what some historian has said about this or that is
not quite right, does not fit what is into the records and seems to have been
too positive in favour of a particular theory. Then there are things that turn
up in the dark corners of libraries etc. such as the recent discovery of a
manual on Anglo-Saxon polyphony; so it did not come with the Normans.
What the
fiction writers can do, when they are serious about trying to depict the past
in a truthful albeit interesting way, is perhaps to encourage us to look at
other ways of seeing the past. In its way, Hilary Mantel's portrayal of Thomas
Cromwell not only told us a little about the then but also about the now.
In an earlier
item there is the 22 May report of the findings at Newbold on Stour in
Warwickshire. They have discovered a henge and bones that suggest settlement
from around four thousand years ago. In the background there is a rise of hills
that mark the beginning of the Cotwolds.
We know this
view very well. The road through the village is the Stratford upon Avon to
Oxford road and a short distance away it crosses the Fosse Way. When I begin to
think of all the people who have traveled these roads it is striking not just
what we do know but how little.
As for modern
history. Who was the footman said to be very close to the then Duchess of Kent,
mother of Queen Victoria?
It's one of the fascinations of history, changes in emphasis and alternative possibilities.
ReplyDelete