Now that the
parties have found their manifestos at the bottom of their gardens or in the
outside facilities we are being treated to media analysis and comment. Which
does not tell us much more. At present there is a hue and cry about those of
the Left.
This article in Naked Capitalism is an attempt to persuade the Left to address
itself to the modern theory of markets as it has evolved in recent years as
opposed to those of long past. The title is "Hayek And Neoclassicals Meet
Information Theory And Fail".
It is a long
article, mathematical in parts, which I suspect will mean that it is beyond the
understanding of almost all the politicians and all the civil servants of
today.
This quote is
the easy bit at the end:
An Interpretation of Economics for the Left. So again, Hayek had a fine intuition: prices and information have some
relationship. But he didn’t have the conceptual or mathematical tools of
information theory to understand the mechanisms of that relationship — tools
that emerged with Shannon’s key paper in 1948, and that continue to be
elaborated to this day to produce algorithms like generative adversarial
networks.
The understanding of prices and supply and demand provided by
information theory and machine learning algorithms is better equipped to
explain markets than arguments reducing complex distributions of possibilities
to a single dimension, and hence, necessarily, requiring assumptions like
rational agents and perfect foresight.
Ideas that were posited as articles of
faith or created through incomplete arguments by Hayek are not even close to
the whole story, and leave you with no knowledge of the ways the price
mechanism, marginalism, or supply and demand can go wrong.
Those arguments assume and (hence) conclude market optimality. Leaving
out the failure modes effectively declares many social concerns of the left
moot by fiat. The potential and actual failures of markets are a major concern
of the left, and are frequently part of discussions of inequality and social
justice.
The left doesn’t need to follow Chris Hayes’ advice and engage with
Hayek, Friedman, and neoclassical economics. The left instead needs to engage
with a real world vision of economics that recognizes the limited scope of
ideal markets and begins with imperfection as the more useful default scenario.
Unquote.
The real world is a funny old place.
If they can reduce human economic behaviour to a collection of equations then a Nobel Prize would follow. Somehow I don't see that happening.
ReplyDelete