"What
if..." is a game that many of us like to play. It is also the stuff of
writers of fiction, historians discussing the past and people in various areas
of interest. No doubt many people in their personal lives think back and murmur
to themselves those very words.
But it is not
recommended for politicians making an aside at a press conference in front of
the media. It invites rage from all opponents, interested parties and others, especially
when it touches on a subject of high sensitivity.
So when President
Trump had a What If moment about President Andrew Jackson (lived 1767-1845,
President 1829-1837) and slavery lasting longer than it might have done it is
not just a foot in the mouth.
For more than
one reason. The period of US history from the 1830's to the Civil War, 1861 to
1865 is complicated in scale and politics. A number of Presidents came and
went. The drive to the West, Manifest Destiny, was in full swing, along with
the issues of the limits of slavery and States rights.
What is and
was less recognised is that the economics of slavery had serious adverse
effects, especially when slaves were bought on borrowed money, entailing
capital being tied up in labour costs and with high interest rates in the funding
by financial operators.
Also, it delivered
a small rich elite, but with many poor whites along with the slaves and others.
One effect was to curtail and limit economic growth in other sectors, a legacy
that continued into the 20th Century.
Nowadays one
of the few growth areas in these States, apart from Outer Space, has been golf
courses, largely tended by low wage migrant labour.
No comments:
Post a Comment