In the
election campaign as well as in the usual run of politics we hear a very great
deal about managing the economy and the many and wondrous things governments
might do to control it in our, or rather their, favour.
They have to
make it sound easy and possible in order to have a chance of garnering the
votes. Most of us know that this is not the case but we put up with it should
we think that we are among the winners rather than the losers.
We assume that
these people are in some way "expert" etc. and many claim to be. We
know that they depend other "experts" in the civil service and
agencies, who have similar PPE degrees to them and can talk wisely about
economists of the past.
If this is not
enough there are many expensive consultants and others ever willing to give
advice, especially as they do not have the responsibility. To return to Stanley
Baldwin, in 1931 he reminded us that power without responsibility was the
prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages.
But when it
comes to the crunch in money matters it is the Central Banks that have a key
role. They in turn have their experts, the ones who run the figures and what
figures they are.
This
long and complex exercise in the mathematics involved comes from Bank
Underground of The Bank Of England. It is the kind of thing which is now the start point. Also, I
suspect barely any or none of the "experts" in government, the media
and the rest can understand a word, or number, of it.
Figure it out
for yourself.
The problem for an outsider including MPs is - how would I ever know if it was worth understanding? What real world tests would apply?
ReplyDelete