Above is William Henry
Beveridge, then Director of the London School of Economics, who transformed its
work and status and built an empire of social studies with an international
range and reputation.
Later was he the man who
delivered the crucial Beveridge Report (see Wikipedia) in December 1942 setting
out the kind of society and state provision that many envisaged for the
post-war future of the UK. He was made a peer in 1946.
Beveridge was a child of
the Raj of India and of the 1936 students some may have been hoping for a
career in the Colonial and perhaps even the ICS, the Indian Civil Service. His
father, Henry Beveridge, of Scots origins, was a senior judge and a leading
Orientalist in sympathy with Indian nationalism.
Henry, born in 1829 was a
young man when the Mutiny broke out which led to the demise of the old
Honourable East India Company Service, HEICS, and the takeover of authority by
the British Government. Change had already begun in the attitude and policy to
India before this.
The new regime was
different in many ways from that of the late 18th and early 19th Century and
similarly how rule was conducted and how the British society in India lived
changed too. The old India had seen
people like Charles Hindoo Stuart with Charles Metcalfe and not
least James Skinner.
William Beveridge was born
in 1879 and grew up in an India in which Auckland
Colvin was a major figure
shaping the Raj that we are more familiar with. The old was not far away. Colvin's
mother was half sister to one of Skinner's closest officers,
Ralph Henry Sneyd, who was
also close to Metcalfe, naming a son after him, had been nominated to the HEICS
army by Stuart and for good measure ended his service as Commander of the
Governor General's Body Guard, later the Viceroy's and now the Presidents.
Sneyd ended his days in
Hampshire across the fields from the Duke of Wellington, the former Sepoy
General, and next door to Elizabeth, widow of Colebrooke Nesbitt, one of the
HEICS Nesbitt's in The City named for the Colebrooke family so prominent in the
early Raj.
It was Sir Henry
Colebrooke who founded the Royal Asiatic Society in London in 1823, modelled on
the 1784 Asiatic Society in Calcutta.
Beveridge was brought into
the Civil Service in 1908 by Winston Churchill, who had served with the 4th
Hussars in India, to add some intellectual bite to the projects of the then
Liberal Government. He did key work during World War One before going to the
Webb's LSE in 1919 to promote his ideas on social administration derived from
India and the new theory of Eugenics.
Because the Raj had been
run by an Indian Civil Service on a centralised and greatly planned basis with
tight controls over subordinate authorities, using agencies and controlled
private sector commerce. It was always that Calcutta, and later Delhi knew best
and where all authority lay.
It is commonplace now for
it to be argued that the central direction of affairs from London in the UK
arose from the two world wars. This is true because of the demands of those
wars. However the Raj had been born out
of many wars and was always at risk of others.
It was the Raj and it's
many senior men in politics, government, law, education and administration that
bestowed on changing Britain the basic attitudes, mind sets and principles of
state control and how to do it. I recall from around fifty years ago the number
of former colonials in senior jobs in central and local government.
In this way we are all
children of the Raj. But in the 21st Century it is not going to be the British
who will be in charge and cracking the whip, it will be the children of our
former subjects.
No comments:
Post a Comment