There are
times when watching the TV when I sigh a deep sigh. Often it is to mutter, why
do they not go into the detail of demographic statistics, variability and
analysis? Possibly, because they have a storyline to tell that they want people
to watch.
The papers
have covered the story of the first episode of the latest run of "Who Do
You Think You Are?" on BBC1. It dealt with Danny Dyer, the actor prominent
in the series "East Enders" who is an East Ender playing an alpha
ultra East Ender who turns out to have Royal ancestry.
It began with
the personal story emphasising his working class London background. The first
part went back several generations in London and was said to have a hint of
French ancestry, aha, the Huguenots and religious persecution and migration,
but that was not chosen.
There was a
marriage to an ordinary lady of East Anglian ancestry, who was the
"gateway". A few generations earlier in the 17th Century her forebear
had been a Royalist landowner busted by the Puritans. Further back there was a
marriage, another marriage and then a Seymour, the same ones that King Henry
VIII married into.
Then before
there was Lionel of Antwerp, a younger son of King Edward III and away you go. Who
would have thought it, how could it have been possible, how unique is Danny?
The answer to that is that he is far from unique. Out there is a huge number of
people, who are among his distant cousins.
Good for Danny
and his family, he was lucky enough to have a team of experts and historians do
the job for him. It made up for the sad case of a convicted lady who had
suffered serious poverty.
But I bet I
have more convicts that he has.
Isn't he related to all of us through our common ancestors trudging out of the Rift valley? Except that some of us learned to speak properly . . . .
ReplyDeleteI have a cousin who is a Dyer so I might try claiming a connection with Edward III. They came from the south too.
ReplyDelete