When and how
are fair questions to ask about many things. But when it comes to where humans
came from and their history over the millennia we are still finding our way
about the remains that are left and the potential interpretations.
These interpretations
and the ideas, assumptions and guesses we make in what we call politics, philosophy,
economics and history, ancient and modern are not just an academic matter. A
good deal of the present thinking is derived from our notions about the past.
The past may be different than that what most of us have been led to
believe. This book review by Steven Mithen in the latest London Review of
Books, titled "Why Did We Start Farming" summarises the book by James
C, Scott titled "Against The Grain; A Deep History of Earliest
States". It is literally food for thought.
This is a long
read and not something to click, scan and rush off to the football scores or
latest media thing. One of the many ideas that are questioned is why ancient
cities built high walls. We have always assumed that they were to keep the outsiders
out. Possibly, it might be that they were more designed to keep people in.
What interests
me is that one factor little considered by historians etc. more interested in
Kings, wars and elites, is disease, which perhaps mattered a lot more than
we think.
Q: Why did we start farming?
ReplyDeleteA: Beer.
Whisky?
DeleteYou need beer to make whisky...
DeleteI'm sure disease did matter more than we tend to assume. It may have been the root cause of many migrations once an area was thought to be unhealthy.
ReplyDeleteIt’s either correct or revisionism.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete