Things change
and can change fast. If anything the
pace, nature and extent of change has been on the increase and is not letting
up. There are those who promote and seek
change, often because they see benefit from them. Others put up with it and many others resent
it.
We were made
aware that on the Left there are those who believe in and want "creative
destruction" in society and the economy because of theories that this can
only be for the better, at least for those doing the creating. What is manifest among these is a lack of
awareness or understanding of the unintended consequences and they pretend
certainty where there is none.
For others
there are those again who look out for it, some of whom want it, others
accepting that it is a necessary condition of human life that things cannot
stay the same. But changes can be big or
small with the kick that a lot of small ones can make a big one.
Inevitably,
now many corporations and businesses have got into the change business if only
to attempt survival or to be in the position of controlling change for their
own purposes. There seems to be a new
way of looking at this.
This article on the subject from
Project Syndicate under the title of "Creative Self-Disruption" is
not long but heavy in the wordage at points.
One brief
quote says:
Finally, the micro-level forces that have
the potential to drive segment-wide transformations should be internalized at
every level of the company.
Unquote.
Or briefly it can be the little things that
turn out to mean a lot in the way the business or a particular market works. At the moment we are being told by our
prospective rulers that they will allow us to stay the same and have what we
have but their governments will change all those things which certain interests
want to be changed.
One way or another it will not cost most of
us anything and we will all be a lot better off because either the rich will
pay or we will all be so rich we will not notice the taxes or something like
that. Governments are now looking to borrow huge sums of money on the premise
that people will get back much less than they lend.
Circles will be squared and for those who
do not want squares then ovals or oblongs will be provided by the government.
What was all that about mens sana in
corpore sano?
From your link :-
ReplyDelete"Banks are also adapting, but much more slowly and hesitantly."
Too true.