We have
learned a few things that the SNP are likely to demand of its Labour associates
should they form a coalition of sorts after the May election.
These have
been the stuff of shock horror stories in the media. This has had the effect of distracting attention
from those other demands which perhaps are better not mentioned at the moment.
One unexpected
item may be that the annual Trooping The Colour will be summarily
abolished. Not only does it involve
cruelty to horses, will appeal to the Greens, but the ritual praises a form of
society which is of the past and is offensive to the present.
Not only are
their blatant class distinctions but the higher ranks shout orders at the lower
and expect instant and unquestioning obedience. Not just that but the demeaning business of
deferring openly and saluting the persons shouting is required.
There is no
mutuality or personal engagement and little respect for mistakes, such as the
very easy one of dropping your rifle on the RSM's foot. By getting rid of the Trooping with its deference
to the Royal Family it is then possible to move on to the issues arising from
anniversaries of earlier wars.
One example is
the D Day landings; a shocking business.
There are no women in sight, on the beaches there is no provision put in
place for health and safety, proper amenities and such, never mind facilities
for the elderly, children and disabled to take part in the event.
When the
paratroops and commando's go in where are the forward elements to engage in
positive and meaningful discussions with those of different opinions on the
German side? Where are the compliance
officers, therapists and social engagement advisers? There are none.
Also the new
coalition should bring to an end the attention being given to the past events
such as the disgraceful business at Agincourt where the deeply prejudiced
English would not accept a majority decision.
This
"victory" prevented an economic union between England and France
which would have transformed lives in that the Auld Alliance between France and
Scotland would have meant Scots rule for the Atlantic Isles much earlier than
when it occurred in the 17th Century.
For the Battle
of Waterloo, represented as a "British" success, the English spite
and malignant attitude to the wise, far seeing and reforming Napoleon put back
the cause of European Unity for a century and a half.
Again, as the
picture above displays, the cruelty to horses was central to the English
cavalry. Had the Auld Alliance still
held force this would never have happened.
To return to
the period 1944 to 1945, had the London government of the day sought to have
come to terms with the vision of European unity of that time rather than insist
on purely aggressive military intervention it is possible that mutual
concessions could have meant a united Europe in the late 1940's.
But all this
is history and how we might see it. One
matter the SNP could demand is that the government should lobby the EU to move
on from the outdated tune from Beethoven's 9th Symphony and replace it by one
more suited to the present day.
This anthem from the
past in Wikipedia, "Partant Pour La Syrie" would be a happy
choice and which can be found on youtube here with pictures which
would be uplifting to us all.
Personally, I prefer Chant de L'Oignon, but you can't have everything.
But the great
question that when Labour and the SNP sit down together, unless of course
Labour have to stand, where will Nick Clegg be?
Making the
tea? Green, of course, without milk or
sugar.
Awa' ya pudd'n'! Thae "English cavalry" ur oor Scots Greys!
ReplyDeleteWell spotted, Corporal!
Delete"the disgraceful business at Agincourt"
ReplyDeleteI agree, there wasn't even a proper risk assessment beforehand. Did the promoters of the Agincourt project even consider the possibility of cost overruns? I don't think so.
I'm beginning to like your posts ;)
ReplyDelete(timbo614)