"Let us
have the facts" is a familiar request in many fields. The trouble is what
one person may see as fact another does not and some facts are elusive. They
can be difficult to believe if true and when used in debate become slippery and
difficult.
Egyptology is
an academic field that has been around for over two centuries owing its origin
to Napoleon and his French invasion of Egypt. Their successors have been
digging away, classifying etc. now for a long time and are a major school of
archaeology, with all that is entailed.
Science
has now become a greater instrument for discovery and analysis of what has
been, rather than the painstaking work of digging, identifying on the basis of
previous findings and then theorising on what might have been what.
The rapid and
nature of 21st Century Science in particular is not only making discoveries but
could cause revision or new thinking in many areas, to the discomfort of the
established schools of thought if not entailing radical changes in some
respects.
The report
concludes:
But Egyptologists say that science cannot replace
archaeologists and their work on the ground. "It is important to have
science in archaeology," said Hawass.
"But it is very important not to let scientists
announce any details about what they found unless it has been seen by
Egyptologists."
Unquote.
This could get interesting and very difficult.
The hunger for drama could make things interesting and difficult too.
ReplyDelete