There have
been two stories in the media that have excited the various pundits who try to
control our thinking. The more important is the person to play the role of
"Dr. Who" in the coming series.
Apparently, it
is no longer the sort of chap you would never invite to a party but an active female
who reminds you of the Head Cook in the school kitchens only wearing trousers.
When it first started in November 1963 after a few minutes we decided it wasn't
for us.
The lesser
story is that we are all going to starve if we do not stay in the EU.
Committees and commentators are queuing up to say that food supplies would
become insecure, unsafe and increasingly expensive if British exit succeeded.
Around thirty years ago I recall seminars and lectures saying the same about
food supplies.
Only they were
not discussing it in terms of Europe, in or out, but trying to tell us that
something was happening which if it went on would be as bad, if not worse, than
a nuclear world war or a collapse of major states for economic reasons usually
related to monetary and debt problems.
At that time
they were careful to stick to the numbers and implications to avoid issues
of race, culture and others which would mean that the real threat was relegated
in other conflicts of ideas. Simply, there were few places in the world where
the population was becoming relatively static or reducing.
Most were
others where populations were either still growing steadily at relatively
predictable rates and others where growth was rapid and there were
uncertainties as to what would happen when food supplies became inadequate or
failed. This last group was largely composed of the poorest states with least
economic growth or potential.
Their concern
was that there had to be a point when humanity had demanded so much of the
Earth's resources that no more increase was possible. The lessons of history
were that there had been many times when one area or another could no longer
feed the people dependent on it.
This had been
largely countered in the mid 20th Century when progress in transport, storage,
technology of food and management of the land enabled increases of supply. So
when I was born into a UK population of around 40 million emigration was
regarded as essential to the future and this was reinforced by war and its
aftermath. Now I am in a population of 65 million where immigration is said to
be essential for economic reasons.
But the Greens
tell us that time is running out for Earth and its ability to feed us . There
are scientists who claim that the larger crops arising from the way the land is
worked mean that there is a limit to how many more the land can produce and
before that decreases will begin and in parts of the world are already evident.
In short food
supplies are destined to become insecure, unsafe and increasingly expensive
whatever happens and on a world basis. The Brexit issue is only at the margin
and requires us to trust Brussels to manage it properly.
Those areas
that suffer worst will become the ones from which large scale population
transfers occur to other places, any places which have basic food. This has
happened in the past in many places and in the Atlantic Isles in recent
centuries. It happened in Germany in the late 1940's. We forget this too easily.
Back in the
1940's we knew a man with a van who now and again on his work travels would go
out to farms to buy potatoes for cash, no questions asked. They did cost more,
but we were never short of spuds.
Round here there are people who could benefit from diminished food supplies.
ReplyDelete