The press are
hotfoot after the BBC people to discuss the matter of their salaries, now
revealed. They are saying little or nothing about their own. The example they
chose is that of the Prime Minister. It is a little like comparing a train
driver to a truck driver. They seem to be doing much the same thing but that is
not the case.
When we were
tripping up and down to London and visiting places we would often see a face
and ask, who is he or she, were they in this or that programme, do you remember
this once famous person? One such place was Stratford Upon Avon where family
visits meant doing shopping and such like.
Some of these
people had enjoyed longer careers, but for some their period of fame and
therefore fortune had not lasted for long and they had to go into other trades.
There was a time when once famous film faces were often to be found running
boarding houses in the days before seaside resorts declined.
In short many
of the people who are now among them will soon be forgotten and their agents
will no longer be able to dictate the terms of their contracts. The crucial
figures are those for audiences. If a face fails to pull the viewers the
curtains will be drawn. For them this fame can become a
liability, in that very many do not want a former star on their payrolls.
In the world
of film, commercial theatre and general TV this is the norm and it is a
business where you get what you can and if wise this will give an income and
pension if you can hold onto it, or better chose the right financial adviser.
Even then there is bad luck, divorce and financial crashes to contend with.
The root
problem is that it is the BBC, a state entity, that is the employer and this is
funded substantially by the license fee although there are other income
streams. This means that the performers are seen as being paid out of a tax,
chargeable whether or not you ever watch them.
The real
question may be is it time for this ninety year old state radio, later TV and
now internet service to be sold off to the highest bidder; probably foreign, or
do we want to keep it as one of the few things left to us?
"do we want to keep it as one of the few things left to us?"
ReplyDeleteNo.