The headlines
and the media tell us that issues of Anti-Semitism have returned to be a part
in our politics of the present. They have been with us a long time. Whether
they were here when the Romans ruled is a question. What is certain is that in
1290 the King banished Jews from England.
In the years
following very few came and went depending on the monetary needs of the Kings
and Queens and The City, but it was Cromwell in 1657 who allowed their return,
subject to terms and conditions.
Our modern
problems arose in the 19th Century when the theories of politics, race and religions
of the time triggered mass expulsions of Jews who arrived in the West and
America in numbers. The 1930's and later added more. In the 21st Century we are
back not where we started but into the kind of political mess that can occur.
On 31 July
2014, I posted the below, quote:
In the
Embankment Gardens in London, below the gaze of the statue of Robert Burns, is
a small First World War memorial to the officers and men of The Camel
Corps. Inscribed on it are the familiar
names of current locations of war and conflict in parts of the Middle East.
In all the
attention given to WW1 it is likely that little or less will be given to the
triumphs and disasters of the British Army there and how or why this followed
the collapse of the ancient Ottoman Empire. Our perspective is largely derived
from the film Lawrence of Arabia; colourful, if inaccurate near fiction.
Britain and
France had been in contention in this part of the world for a long time before
1914, almost coming to war in 1898 with The Fashoda Incident. But then Germany arrived on the scene making
an ally of Turkey and seeking to drive a railway from Berlin to Baghdad and to
establish itself as a major power in the region.
In the later
part of the 19th Century Russia had sought to drive out its Jewish population
leading to mass migrations to western Europe and beyond. This in turn provoked Anti-Semitism there on
the one part and Zionism on the other, the belief that the Jews should return
to Palestine as a warrior race.
A result of
this was the Anglo-French Sykes Picot agreement during the War with the object
of assisting Jews to migrate to Palestine.
In the Versailles Peace Treaty, Lloyd George to please the Bible readers
in Wales and others, was proud to emerge with the British Mandate for
Palestine.
But the Empire
had bitten off more than it could chew.
There was no necessary agreement in Britain to all this in that there
was a strong pro-Arab school of thought and it was not long before the influx
of Jews, the new Israelites began to cause first tensions and then serious
problems. Not least for Britain for whom
the traditional balancing and compromise was never going to work.
It took a
major military presence in Palestine and some firm and unpopular government to
keep any kind of peace and there was always one problem after another. While for the officers it might be one thing
but for the other ranks it was a grim posting.
It is not too much to say that a good deal of certain ethnic prejudices
among the ordinary British was learned by conscripts cooped in sweaty barracks
engaged on risky policing duties.
At the end of
WW2 the situation became dire and a costly impossible one to resolve so the
British simply decamped and left them to it in the late 1940's. As a result of WW2 the flow of Jewish
refugees became a flood and the British authorities had to contend with active
terrorism when they tried to curtail it.
In 1956 in a
mad bid to reassert British authority in the area and especially over the Suez
Canal, Anthony Eden provoked a conflict which added to the damage and the
collapse of this project is generally taken to be the point at which it came
evident that Britain was no longer a major power.
We have being
playing pretend games ever since this as the conflicts have rumbled on
producing harsh dictatorships, various forms of terrorism, armed conflicts and
all that we see now. In the early 1970's
one result was the oil price shock which happened when the Heath government had
decided to spend its way out of financial difficulties.
Inflation,
that had been building up for some time, took off and wreaked havoc with both
the economy and politics after Wilson had replaced Heath in the 1974
election. After two years Wilson was a
spent man and replaced by Callaghan. His
government was wrecked by the inflation and in 1979 defeated by Mrs. Thatcher.
Now we are all
back, more or less, where we started. We
have learned little not least because our politicians and associates do not do
much history and because the media stick to stereotypes and simplicities in a
highly complex part of the world.
A hundred
years ago just after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the West tried to take
over. Now our power and influence has
also collapsed there is no sign of any way that the problems can be resolved
short of a series of bloodbaths and disasters.
The economic
and political effects of this, the consequences of history will be felt by all
and whether the fall out in our own urban areas with its varied populations
from among the warring groups will become violent we do not know. Nor will we know what to do or why.
Are we at the
beginning of not just a new phase but a new and different Hundred Years War?
Unquote.
We have a
General Election impending, if Anti-Semitism etc. becomes one of its features
it will be absolute proof that we have politicians who learn nothing and know
nothing.
Good point but do we need absolute proof? Maybe we already have enough.
ReplyDelete