You would
think there was enough to worry about in terms of money and monetary systems
for the Bank of England to be concerned about weather forecasting.
This is not the case as this article in Bank Underground suggests.
Because bad weather might mean insurance claims and very bad mean numbers of
very large claims. It concludes:
Quote:
In summary, we have shown that if the
last 30-years frequencies persist, the recent experience of the 2017 hurricane
season is probably not an outlier but closer to the norm.
This is an important topic for insurers
and others alike, and one where further research is needed to improve our
collective understanding of hurricane clustering and its potential impact.
Given these trends, insurers, in
particular, need to consider the operational, economic and risk management impact
of the assumptions made when modelling hurricanes.
Unquote.
The "frequency" relates to a
series of hurricanes in "clusters". One hurricane is bad enough but a
run of them across the same wide track in the USA can devastate a whole region.
The Bank is concerned that insurance
companies may not cope with the consequences. If they cannot or even fail then
the costs fall elsewhere.
As what is very bad for insurance
companies is bad for an economy and monetary systems. Serious dangers arise, financially,
politically and even internationally.
So this summer keep an eye on the weather
reports as well as what may or may not be happening in the markets or even the
football.
It's the small risk but huge impact problem. Not easy to estimate risk either because hurricane stats are not well behaved.
ReplyDeleteThey’ll just have to regulate those hurricanes, that’s all.
ReplyDelete