One of the
questions older people might ask themselves as time wears on and they wear out
is if they are living in a larger property than is required; whether they are
living in the house or for the house. As being older their property is older so
there are all the costs of repair, maintenance, heating etc. which do not
reduce.
This is
nothing new. Noel Coward had a song about "The Stately Homes Of
England" and the upper classes and the lengths they had to go to in order
to keep their houses standing in the period between the wars. These days the
issues have become obscured by the way the market in property has gone, but are
still there, lurking.
Also, in
business, it is not unknown for a firm to be identified with an iconic
building, or have a prestige head office which in time the firm seems to be
working for rather than the office being subject to the firm's real needs.
In this
context the SNP member, Mhairi Black, who has expressed her dislike of the
Palace of Westminster, may be on to something. At one time, rather in the past,
I saw it as a wonderful building and therefore necessary to government.
Now I am not
so sure. It is certainly grand but now much decayed, that is the structure as
well as The Lords, and will cost a huge amount to put right. But is not the
only thing that has decayed and another is what we used to refer to as The
British Constitution.
It is possible
to argue that the internal complexities of the building and its brooding
architecture is now The Constitution in effect, and that government follows
from this instead of the other way round.
Certainly, The
British Constitution from say, fifty years ago, no longer exists as such and
only the rules, habits and procedures of Parliament remain to act as a
quasi-constitution. What matters most now are the lobbies rather than the
Chambers and the lobbyists rather than the members, almost surplus to real
function.
This blog has
already suggested that it is high time Parliament moved to the centre of
England, say Tamworth, in buildings and offices fit for purpose and flexible in
use as changes occur. The first time I was at Westminster, in Churchill's time,
I was impressed. The last time in Gordon Brown's we could not get out fast
enough.
In my inbox
there is sitting an invitation to an evening at the House of Lords which we are
unlikely to attend. We fear that we might be faced with an Earl or two rattling
a collecting box.
How any SNP member can complain about the Palace of Wastemonster when they championed that 4king excrescence at the foot of the High Street is beyond my understanding. Mind you, so is the Schottische Nazionalsocialiste Partei.
ReplyDeleteWhy not go to the House of Lords and bend a few ears? Check if they are awake first though.
ReplyDeleteSome business saddled with large prestige buildings rather too large will lease bits and pieces to whoever might find the space useful. The rent helps towards the upkeep.
ReplyDeletePerhaps this might be done with the Palace, perhaps the cellars could be rented out for storage. I recall there were problems with that in the past, but better vetting of the renters may help.