The debate continues about
the HS2 project, the High Speed Train, from the inner suburbs of London to the
inner suburbs of Birmingham to save a few minutes on the journey at a cost of
now £50 billion and rising. The starting
price, I think, was £15 billion.
A
blunt clear exposition of the fake and faulty economics of the scheme are
dealt with by John Redwood in his blog which tally with my own view. The
railways have been with us for near 200 years ago and have been the cause of
almost as many financial disasters as major train crashes.
In 1845 The Railway Mania
all but wrecked the entire economy and played a major role in worsening the
effects of hunger and famine across The Atlantic Isles as the corn dealers and
growers joined the bankers and brokers in the debtors prisons.
These
1960's trains were an early form of luxury HST, the Blue Pullmans which
indeed offered a special and expensive service to those that used them. Also, they were rather faster than the
ordinary services. They attracted
publicity but not profit.
What they did do was to
pave the way for the later 1970's HS trains, the 125's which gave faster, more
comfortable trains but running frequently and at prices that were just about
affordable for most people rather than a select few.
In short British Railways
learned the hard way that what was needed was general improvements in trains
and facilities for the bulk of the travelling population across as much of the
network as possible.
HS2 must annoy those with no wish to travel to Birmingham or London.
ReplyDelete