Last winter it was fair to
say that here in the UK we had an inundation.
We were assured that it was due to a curvy jet stream and this did not
happen very often.
Also, there are other
stories of how it could happen, one being pollution in the Pacific doing things
to temperatures and air flows.
Curvy Jet Steams are nothing
new in an article in Science Daily and have happened before. The article is longish and covers a good deal
of research ground but tells us that weather shifts and associated climatic
fluctuations are the norm.
The one dealt with around
four thousand years ago is from a time before mankind really went into carbon
making, we think.
It may be if this was a
time of population growth needing more land to cultivate more forests were
burned but that may well have not been enough.
Which raises the awkward
question that if indeed there are real changes on the way it may not be mankind
it could be whatever else Earth has to throw at us. What if the idea of change is right but the
cause different to what we think?
Population depends on
crops. Crops depend on weather. Weather depends on air flows and sea
temperatures. So are the air and sea
affected by population or not?
Discuss.
If a more curvy jet stream is likely to be enhanced by global warming then we are in luck because it isn't warming.
ReplyDeleteIs it the researchers or their PR minders who mix in these fashionably alarming fancies in order to attract attention and more funding?