On Friday
evening we were on BBC4 TV although you had to be very fast and to know
precisely where to look to catch a glimpse.
It was the 7.30 programme running the Mozart Piano Concerto No. 23 from
The Proms of 2006 and we were in The Arena with the other great unwashed.
Checking
the diary I was reminded that it was one of those nights when the train broke
down on the way home. It could have made
a TV programme, “Homeless At Hither Green” with a mob of people who were far
from happy with their lot.
For years
it has been impossible to understand the management of the TV relays from The
Proms. Radio 3 have done a reliable
capable job in covering all of them and has great experience. But why the BBC could not combine its radio
coverage with the different TV channels deployed is a mystery.
To put it
commercially, The Proms are a premium product, flagship and major event and the
rest. Yet the TV coverage hops about
from channel to channel, with cut and shuffle and little rational explanation
of why these few things are covered but not others. Some of those ignored would certainly command
a wide audience.
Even that
untypical and unrepresentative Last Night is split between two channels. This may have been logical in the 1970’s but
has become less and less so down the decades.
In the age of the internet when it is possible to put all live on screen
and world wide the BBC still fumbles and bumbles its coverage.
Worse
still, the archive containing many rare and wonderful items is inaccessible and
unused save for bits and pieces that turn up in other programmes or the odd one
or two that have escaped and are seen on satellite channels. There is one of the worlds great music
archives here, if not the greatest and it is better hidden than a Pharaoh’s
tomb from a lost dynasty.
What is
strange and we have been at many Proms is that during a season the BBC are
constantly coming and going to do the few that are screened. All the kit need for a performance comes in, goes
out and then another lot or the same lot returns a few days later. Merry go round it may be but by no stretch of
the imagination is it management.
Given this
example of BBC organisation, or rather disorganisation going on, literally
under my nose, it is no surprise to discover that in other areas of its
activity things do not happen as they might or as they should. Nor that what does happen is difficult to
explain.
Yet this is
a state entity, substantially funded by a form of poll tax. But today, there seem to be an increasing
number of people who avoid it. It has
survived as it is largely because it is main media entwined with our political
and governmental bodies and other central media like snakes in a barrel.
And all the
snakes have started to bite.
Hi:
ReplyDeleteOne of my daily reads is over at http://reflexionesfinales.blogspot.com/
That being said, he recently reviewed a book from the mid-seventies in the post
http://reflexionesfinales.blogspot.com/2012/11/high-rise-review.html
I had read this years ago in an odd situation and it made quite a bit of sense at the time. I was wondering if you had read the book in question, and, if so, what was your opinion of same.
As always, best regards
John
Certain media figures living overseas must be highly delighted at the present bread and circuses media situation here. No longer do I watch what is called news on any English TV. No wonder history has been so badly taught in state schools for a long time. You can learn some things from the past - so don't teach it. Everything I thought could happen has happened since Libya was invaded. It is becoming more and more like a modern witch hunt, to distract many people from what is truly important. The snakes of course know that.
ReplyDelete"Yet this is a state entity, substantially funded by a form of poll tax."
ReplyDeleteI think that's the explanation. Internally it will be a bureaucratic, back-biting shambles.