While the
main media goes into overdrive about The Leveson Report into the UK Press; you
have all been bad boys and girls; it has to stop and we have ways of making you
behave yourselves. Spanking is out
unless privacy can be pleaded.
The EU
Referendum blog points out the strange business of The Energy Bill being
published on the same day that Leveson lent us his thoughts. Richard North asserts that as the Press is
declining fast and few people trust TV in any case, many of us look for our
news and comment from elsewhere.
Freedom of
speech and comment is very important indeed, with some safeguards open to all
and not just the rich few. Energy,
however, could be argued as being more important because the whole structure of
our economies and hence current society are now dependent on the supplies of
energy immediately on call.
Our need
for reliable energy is phenomenal compared to the relatively recent past. I can recall a home with a handful of low
power light bulbs sparingly used, no separate power sockets, no heating
appliance that used electricity, a radio listened to only when necessary and a
flat iron that needed to plugged into a light socket.
There was a
gas cooker and heating was by coal fires, when you could get or afford the
coal. In contrast at this moment, a
computer system is in operation, the storage heaters are all fully charged, at
least five bright lights are on, the water heater is probably active, a radio
is going and later another radio and TV in use.
There is a
fridge, a freezer, an electric kettle, the kitchen hob is being used, but not
the oven at present and probably one or two other things in use. The washer/dryer is resting but will soon be
needed.
We have
been to shops today whose functioning and distribution systems use huge amounts
of electrical power, stopped at garages to refill ditto and on and on and
on. Any real disruption or loss of
supply would see us in real trouble,
The story
of the last two decades have been persistent dither, doubt and evasion of the
issues being created by the need for new supplies of electricity, the upkeep of
the national grid and the monitoring and payment for use. Inevitably, into this vacuum of government
thinking and policy all sorts of opportunists have intruded.
There is
enough discussion on the web about the disastrous intervention by too many
vested interests with a lot of money to play for in a field where government is
determined to substitute subsidy for policy and go for media friendly schemes
where the media have been bought and only the taxpayer or consumer loses.
What we are
offered is big schemes and big ideas all costing big money. Once the idea of a national grid was that it
linked a distributed network of local power suppliers, each geared with plenty
of spare capacity.
The grid
was available to deal with variations and any local breakdowns. Now we all depend on the grid and supplies
that are limited to major operations with local ones giving relatively limited
inputs which are not reliable.
To base a
future on this kind of operation is asking for trouble, let alone hope an
extension to the Russo-German gas pipeline will save our skins from cold.
My
grandfather, born at a time before electrical power became widely available and
who was over thirty before he made much use of it, often said when told of all
the wonders to come, “Where will it all end?”
We may be
about to find out soon and on the evidence of The Energy Bill sooner than we
think.
"The story of the last two decades have been persistent dither, doubt and evasion of the issues being created by the need for new supplies of electricity"
ReplyDeleteI agree. Somehow it seems to have slipped away from engineers and professionals into the hands of politicians and crazed environmentalists.
Bring back the professionals.