One of the worst
events of Empire was the Amritsar Massacre of April 1919, see Wikipedia, which
ever since has been a subject of angry debate and a matter for which the Raj
and the British Government of the time was responsible.
As I was born rather
later, my parents were not yet teenagers and none of my grandparents nor their
parents never went anywhere near India, why I should be carrying the can
I do not know.
Which brings
me to Colonel Reginald Dyer, the literally dyspeptic acting Brigadier General
who was in charge of the troops. He had been an soldier for thirty years with a
long record of active service. During the First World War he was in one of the
forgotten sectors, the borders of Persia, where bitter battles were fought
between the tribes and peoples.
In the spring
of 1919 the British Army was still running down its troop levels in the
Occupying Force in Germany as well as having had the Murmansk Expedition to
Russia to support the White's against the Reds. At home there had been the
Spanish Flu epidemic and the economy was in the throes of post war change.
In the UK the
Coalition Government elected in November 1918 were still struggling to make
decisions of any kind leaving India to The Raj. The Labour Party, now a large
number in Parliament, were more concerned with Russia and the impending centenary of
Peterloo and its meaning for electoral reasons.
Those ruling
The Raj believed that the Empire was on the brink of collapse, so when trouble
begins around Amritsar etc. they send for Dyer to deal with it. He proved to be
the wrong man in the wrong place at the wrong time. They needed a diplomat and
negotiator and sent in a warrior, with his own problems.
One was his
personal situation. The end of war meant contraction of the armed forces and
with it the officer class facing not a reliable career of promotions and service bringing notice and honours but years of routine garrison duty and
paper pushing without much, if any, promotion.
The secret,
perhaps not so secret, was that Dyer, whatever his record in combat etc. was
not officer class and therefore going to be off the lists for the positions of
highest status. His father had been a brewer who did well after being sent to
India around 1860, the period of the Mutiny and the reprisals, when there were
a lot of thirsty troops in action.
His parents
were of London skilled working class origin and had married in Islington, the
home of his mother's family. This district is now the centre of a socialism determined to wipe out
private enterprise.
How ironic that so many of our private and smaller enterprises have been created and run by those from the Sub Continent.
How ironic that so many of our private and smaller enterprises have been created and run by those from the Sub Continent.
The name Dyer crops up in our family tree but only via marriage.
ReplyDelete