This was a
subject to avoid, given the full media and blogosphere in full cry. But other ideas paled beside the sheer idiocy
of this one. Malcolm Rifkind, the
Scottish Tory refugee in Kensington and Chelsea seems to have gone missing on
parade and not so jolly Jack Straw in Labour perhaps hit by one of the fictional
WMD's that he lost when helping Blair to invade Iraq.
What is
terrifying is that both of these alpha males who fell for a bog standard media
sting about their taking money for services rendered were Secretaries of State
for Foreign Affairs and not just at the heart of government but inside the
Right and Left pulmonary veins.
Rifkind is now
the resigned Chair of the House of Commons Select Committee on Intelligence,
repeat Intelligence, and Straw is out and about advising sundry bodies and
governments on both policy and on the quiet his own ideas about
intelligence. But we will not go into
that, some of his constituents in Blackburn may not be happy.
There is a lot
of mail that comes through the letter box from all sorts of places. There are things that crop up in emails. There are other matters that arise. So what do many people do these days? They check it out, starting online and then
perhaps following through.
Or they
contact someone or a body for an opinion; very easy these days with modern
communications. There are any number of sources. Their reliability may vary but for someone of
any experience or awareness they ought to be able to find something.
These men were
both once at the heights of government yet they could not work out or did not
bother to check at the most basic level of information nor it seems ask any of
their many advisers or researchers or underlings or informed contacts or even,
Zeus save us, people in Whitehall who would have known.
Is that how
they ran the Foreign Office? Is that how
they advised the Prime Minister of their day?
Is that the basis of the many times they stood up in the House of
Commons to inform the House and argue the basis of critical government policy? Worse, is that the way they entered into
binding and crucial commitments and negotiations about all our futures?
It might seem
unlikely given the cohorts of civil servants and others to advise and inform
them. Also, the many interested parties
and organised bodies with their views, reports and information. Yet at the end of it all, when let out to
play on their own, they function at a lower level than the average teenager and
it seems with less capacity for rational thinking.
Are they the exception? Looking
around the various parties and their leaders a shiver goes down the back. When you look further at the next tiers of
personnel and see who is there and what their capabilities might be the shiver
turns into the early stages of panic that this is the way they all are and how
out government is run.
This seems to
be the way it is for the House of Commons.
As for the House of Lords most of them now seem to be people who failed
in the House of Commons. The real
blockheads we sent to Europe.
And the
election will not change anything whichever way it goes.
It's known as arrogance. They never, for one second, believed this approach was anything more than they deserved. Flattering and in their minds, no more than their deluded hubris felt was their due.
ReplyDeleteIn reality we are the stupid ignoramuses who, decade after decade, have voted for them.
"What is terrifying is that both of these alpha males who fell for a bog standard media sting"
ReplyDeleteSpot on - that's the nub of it. The internet seems to highlight just how limited such people are, yet a few decades ago we'd never have known without inside information.
We live in interesting times.