With more ructions over who should provide schools, how, for whom and on what financial basis involving organisations from the wilder shores of speculation and lending it is time to review a post from October 2010 when the world was young and the Coalition had not yet proved its serial incompetence.
It seems that my rambling post may not have been quite as insane as it first appeared.
Education has not been the same since the decline and fall of the Ink Monitors. At one time in an Elementary School (5-14 then leave school) each class might have one. Mostly “he’s”, they would be a trusted pupil and if they proved reliable, polite and diligent they might earn a reference to be a shop assistant or even a clerk.
They learned to check the inkpot at each desk, judge the quantity necessary and pour in the right amount of ink from a jar. To do this they would have to be entrusted with access to the classroom cupboard and would both obtain and return the jar properly and without supervision.
This was integral to a whole culture of steel pen nibs and scarce paper when writing was a form of calligraphy and care needed in the shaping of each letter, the accuracy long since lost.
But think of what might have happened in our modern age had ink still been in use. It is certain that persons of 15-17 or any younger age could never be allowed to undertake such onerous duties.
Nor could teachers or cleaning staff, it would be outside their conditions of service. There would have to be Writing Materials Replenishment Assistants with negotiated salaries and comparable conditions of service.
This would take management and to avoid the post code lottery of differences a staff at local authority level to co-ordinate, manage and supply the needed staff and materials. Clearly high level consultancy would need to be brought in to satisfy the auditors and others that it was all to be done as it should be.
But could local authorities actually be entirely trusted with matters of this kind? It would cry out for central direction and thinking. Possibly, it would begin as part of one government department or another.
Then in recent years an Ink Procurement and Inspection Agency would have been established with fully staffed at salary levels to compete with senior management in the financial sector to ensure that all the angles were covered, the targets set and statistics and supervision ensured.
There would be research budgets. A new department would be funded at the
somewhere to ensure only inks of the highest quality, specifications and safety
standards were in use and to develop new inks. University
of East Dunwich
The standardisation of ink procurement would mean major contracts with all that this entailed. No doubt agreements would be reached in some foreign place for out sourcing all the production for transport by container ships. This would help the
footprint and rid the nation of all the nasty inky manufacturing pollutants.
By some miracle of accounting and with all the consultancy, financing and layers of management and control the filling of inkpots would become critical to keeping up the GDP and stimulation of the velocity of circulation of public sector funding.
The big question is given the need to increase the consumption of ink during a time of economic difficulty whether the use of ink pellets (wodges of paper dripping with ink used as a missile fired by the skilled use of rubber bands) by alienated victims of oppression in the classroom should be subject to reduced or no regulation.
I keep rubber bands in my desk and can still hit a moving target at fifteen paces. Will my time come again to cop the teacher or the Ink Monitor one behind the ear?
Perhaps I should come up with a scheme for a New Elementary School, with classes of sixty minded by an unqualified teacher with no higher education supported by Pupil Teachers, 12-15 year olds, doing the real work and with senior pupils, monitors, on other duties.
It would certainly be cheaper and therefore enable more return on investment to the Hedge Fund or Limited Liability Partnership who put up the money.
More to the point it would almost certainly raise educational standards.