One of the
key sets of figures that turn up in the main media is that of retail sales,
however defined. This is because one of
the economic drivers is how much people spend, where and on what.
Figures
that are going up are regarded as good because it means more activity. Those that are going down are bad because
this indicates decreasing money flows.
Whether or
not the consumption is useful, necessary or wasteful or ornamental is not a
consideration. Fashion is said to be a
driver but where the need to buy essentials turns into purely changing for the sake of change as in the latest designs and models etc. is not clear or
marked. Often the media presents any
fashion change as by definition a necessity.
But
retailing itself has not remained the same by any means. In my time there have been three radical
shifts. After 1939 for a number of years
there was a severe reduction in retailing because the money and effort were
needed for other things.
It was not
until the 1950’s that this began to unwind to the extent that there was much
greater freedom in what people did with their money and the marketing men were
keen to persuade them to spend it. But
then there was little credit for pure consumption reasons and restricted disposable
income because of the cost of basics.
In the UK
one factor in what retailers existed and to what purpose was Retail Price
Maintenance which meant that very many things would cost exactly the same
whether you bought it in the small shop round the corner, or at a nearby shopping
centre or went “up town” to the department stores and posher shops.
This kept
huge numbers of small retailers in business in both town and country. Also it enabled a wide range of smaller
specialist shops to exist alongside the chains and major stores.
When this
was abolished by Edward Heath, President of the Board of Trade in the
Douglas-Home administration of 1963-1964 this unleashed real price competition
in which the larger retail groups and major stores were at an advantage.
This along
with the growth of supermarkets and car ownership etc., allowing greater
consumer mobility over the next couple of decades saw the progressive and
extensive decline of the small local retailer sector.
Retailing
by the 1980’s was a different world to that of the 1950’s in many ways. By then the concentration of shopping into
bigger entities and the new shopping malls was on the way to provide the bulk
of retailing in this period.
Now we are
in the throes of another major change in retailing provision. It is occurring rapidly as the internet and
other communication systems have developed.
Quite how much the figures of today make sense in terms of those of the
past is a matter for real doubt.
Also how
far changes in the nature of employment, patterns of earning, attitude to
spending and critically saving may stay the same or change is entirely
unpredictable. At the moment
theoretically it is not rational to save given current rates of interest and
the unreliability of the financial services.
But there
are other ways of saving and some odd things seem to be happening. Why in this time of serious money problems do
the prices of art works and antiques seem to be rocketing in so many
sectors?
Also,
patterns of spending will change as age profiles alter. If migration either internal or external
affects people in their attitude to what and how they consume different then
this will change. Also, could the public
suddenly tire of “fashion”?
There are
then perceptions of risk among those with disposable money and how they see
their short term and long term futures.
There is a lot that could happen here and the way the world is going old
assumptions could turn out to be hopelessly wrong.
If at the
same time as there is another revolution in how and where we shop suing the net
or other types of retailers along with changing patterns of distribution
systems then our present fixation with the month by month sales figures may
turn out to be a false trail.
We would
all help ourselves by rediscovering what is really meant by “consumption” and
“investment”.
As for personal
investment I wonder what’s running at Kempton Park next Tuesday?
"Whether or not the consumption is useful, necessary or wasteful or ornamental is not a consideration."
ReplyDeleteSomething to ponder on, especially as so many goods and services become more complex.