The debate on
the National Health Service goes on and from the Left we are given the
impression that they are the "defenders" from the forces of change
who must be wrong if they wish to change anything. In the meantime medicine and
medical problems move on.
We learn more
and more and realise much better the complexities and difficulties of many
conditions. But the Left want to just remind us of the past, indeed the long
past, as though nothing could or would change.
A choice example is this tear jerker in The Canary from Harry
Leslie Smith about the indeed tragic loss of his sister, Marion, who had
tuberculosis, TB, at the age of 15. He says she was denied medical treatment
nor were the family given a wheelchair.
There are one
or two problems here. The three towns given for his family are Barnsley,
Bradford and Halifax. All of these had local authority hospital facilities plus
provision for the poor, advanced for their time, and for those signed up with
friendly societies. Also, Marion had been diagnosed, who by and what were his
parents told or asked?
In December
1943 an uncle of mine, much loved and respected died young from TB, he was not
in hospital nor was he given medication. But he had been one of the rare men
working as a nurse in an isolation hospital, where no doubt he had contracted
TB. He opted to die at home with his family.
The drugs that
beat TB, the antibiotics were not available then. The hospital beds were for any
potential survivors, most likely who had the condition spotted early, for whom
long months in an open air ward might just help them beat it.
And you did
not want the serious cases on the ward. The only two options were either a
managed death facility, more or less an annex to the mortuary, or being at home
and told to stay at home.
So contagious
was the disease and so dangerous you did not want victims being wheeled around
the shops or any other public place or even up or down the street. It was not
just a death sentence, it was being put into isolation as well.
The local
Medical Officers of Health had TB as a major priority along with other bad
ones, for example Typhoid. I recall one school I attended before the NHS was created
where a pupil was found with TB and they came in like the cavalry at Waterloo
to deal with it.
Go home, stay
at home and wait for the results parents and pupils were instructed. Parents
who did not take heed were told that if they were not careful their children
would be taken into isolation for months. My parents were far from happy but
obeyed.
The creation of
the NHS occurred at the same time as major advances in pharmaceuticals,
treatments, surgery and in other fields of medicine, notably training and
functioning of family doctors. It was never simply "private" and
never had been.
The problem in
the late 1940's arose mainly from the effects of two world wars within thirty
one years, other crises, all the industrial and employment conditions on the
rise, the ex-service injured and the increasing numbers of births etc. The
greater movement of people added to this.
Clearly some
central policy thinking and direction would be needed in certain fields, also
how to give stimulus to improvement and to even out the differences between
local authorities. What it did not need was the wipe out of so much of the
local and charitable provision and imposition of detached bureaucracies
regardless of function.
We now have
the transformations possible in the digital age and other major challenges.
Does the Left seriously think that these can be dealt with by people sitting in
offices in London being directed by committees of politicians with poor degrees
in PPE?
"Does the Left seriously think..."
ReplyDeleteProbably not but it is enshrined in doctrine and almost impossible to alter, as Blair discovered.