Bonfire Night
has long been a pain in the ears, especially since all the cheap foreign fireworks
etc. became available. My young ones when given a choice between bangers or the
cash, opted for the cash. I wonder how many, if made that offer, would do the
same?
Normally, I
prefer to avoid "ifs and buts" of history, but so long as not too
much is made of it can be an interesting perspective. One assumption I do not
agree with is that had Guy Fawkes and the plotters succeeded, the Catholics
would have taken control.
It is said
that the House of Lords would have gone up with the King, but in the British
way of primogeniture for land and titles there would have been a good many
heirs in waiting of the right age, some young, but still there. There would be
the core of a new second chamber.
Then there was
the House of Commons, largely composed of the higher gentry who wielded much of
the power in the counties, the law and the rest. Along with them were the
leaders of the boroughs and the major merchant and financial families.
These are the
people who did well out of The Reformation. That it is assumed that the Holy
Orders of Rome would just return and take it all back is unlikely. They would
need an army behind them, either that of Spain, or France.
Such an army
might succeed if the population were divided enough or not capable. But this
did not apply in England or Scotland. The logistics alone would be challenging
but the extent of opposition would present serious difficulties.
There are
other things. If James V and I had died, then he would not have pursued either
his creation of monopolies or the gross spending sprees on entertainment and
giving out largesse to his special favourites. He would not have created the
situation that led to King Charles I facing a revolution.
If a monarch
had been appointed whose spending was under control and fitted needs better and
above all allowed industry and commerce to grow and create riches the
industrial revolution might have happened a lot earlier.
What the
choice of monarch might have been had James family been wiped out as well
raised the question of the union with Scotland. It may have been that they might
go their separate ways again; the Scots reverting to medieval and other
rivalries between the major families and the English nurturing the wool trade
and contacts with the Low Countries.
Best of all;
those awkward people with their beliefs centred on The Bible and that The
Reformation was unfinished business may have been able to stay at home in
England instead of going off across The Atlantic to take land from the local
population.
No James, no "Mayflower",
have a good Thanksgiving.
The "ifs and buts" of history do suggest how random a particular course of events may be.
ReplyDeleteDon’t think it would have made a lot of difference - they would just have replaced from those lined up.
ReplyDelete