One of the early
joys of the day is to check the local roads to count the accidents and road
works and see whether the red lines are all around, or if we are lucky, only
adjacent and avoidable. The motoring question soon may become more political
and a source of many discontents.
A plea to go back to the past to when vehicles displayed tax discs from the
DVLA is made by Stephen Glover in The Daily Mail. One of those wonderful
wheezes of government to save a bit of money was to get rid of them by
digitising the system. Yes, we have heard that one before.
He claims that
the losses incurred are massive, they mutter and say, yes well, it is a lot but
not that much and hey guy's we are digital. The basic law of humanity that if
there is a way round or a risk worth taking because the chances of being caught
are minimised many more will have a go was ignored.
So on our
roads it seems that a great many cars now are not taxed. Which raises other
questions about whether they are insured or not. The other question, especially
in the younger generations is whether many of them do not have a valid license.
The car tax
itself is due to change in April when the new VED system from the time of
George Osborne, who has since made his escape, will come into force. Instead of
a flat rate tax system we now have one based on your emissions, or rather those
of your car. This is a long story involving the EU and others that I will skip.
There is
guidance available, but it is clear that some drivers will be hit hard. Among
those will be many using automatic gearboxes, that includes inevitably, many
people with problems for whom manual gear systems are difficult. The recent VW
scandal suggests that some car makers have been imaginative in declaring their
emissions, but we shall see.
The signs are
that a lot of people will be paying much more and unhappy whilst others will be
paying little or nothing because their car has low emissions. They may drive
more miles, use the roads a great deal, consume lots of petrol, which is taxed,
etc. but this is no matter. What will happen, again, is many people being peeved
and possibly a disruption in the car markets.
Given that so
many people need cars today this all could be an exercise in how to lose votes.
Also, it could involve losing tax income as a great many more decide to take their
chance and skip paying car tax at all.
Then there is
the economics of car owning at present and the sales practices of so many
agents. For many the move to cheap old cars taken off the radar of the records
that can be dumped at will at little loss is very tempting.
There are
other motorists on the roads besides the UK citizens. Many EU "working
visitors" have brought their own cars (or I suspect in a number of cases
somebody else's cars) with them. There is guidance about taxing etc. for
incomers if you can work it out. Very many of the visitors do not seem to have
bothered.
But it
suggests that the authorities do not inquire much as to what is going on in
reality. Locally, the number with EU plates is remarkable, again tempting to
have one going cheap in a quick cash deal. These "visitor" cars may
not be insured, or taxed and the drivers may even not have licenses, who knows?
Why bother?
So driving
becomes ever more dodgy and the good citizen who does his duty and pays his
dues is the loser, especially if an accident occurs. All it needs is cowboy
lawyers willing to act for untaxed, unlicensed etc. drivers who bump into you.
Oh, it seems
that there are already a lot of them out there.
Muttley, do
something? Scrap car tax and increase fuel tax?
Put fuel tax up by £0.02 or £0.03 per litre, and the average driver of the average car will see no change in cost. The tax will be unavoidable and completely progressive (in the true sense of the word).
ReplyDeleteSack the whole parasitic department in Swansea and the Country as a whole will be better off, including the Magistrates courts. If there is no road tax, there can be no transgression.
We have seen the results of a couple of DVLA trawls where their contractors clamp untaxed cars. Surprising how many there are.
ReplyDeleteAround here they favour camera traps to check on road tax, insurance and MOT.
ReplyDeleteWhen a friend in a car with foreign plates (genuine reason!) was snapped by one of Ken Livingstons cameras for congestion charge in London, they tracked the registered owner down in Belgium to demand a fine be paid. There wasn't a way to pay the charge on a car with a non-British number plate at the time, although there may well be now.
The only reason to put all these complicated, cumbersome and expensive systems in place is to ream the motorist.
I might have more sympathy with the camera checks on MOT and (even) insurance if they were not so infernally greedy about everything else.
Excellent points.
ReplyDeleteOne of the early joys of the day is to check the local roads to count the accidents
ReplyDeleteLove it.
And excellent points.