In the
"what fun" category of revisiting, revising, re-examining the course
of history the BBC this week is giving us Lucy Worsley once again. She is to
change our minds about King Richard III; now is the winter of our discontent to
his mates; then The Glorious Revolution of 1688; King Billy rules OK, or rather
his missus did; and lastly the Creation of the Raj, or how we got hooked onto
the caffeine in the tea with the odd shot of opium and needed the gold to
maintain our financial liquidity as well.
Another more
delicate matter is a look at the KKK, the variants of the Ku Klux Klan, and its
Scottish origins. Secret societies; they were with about as much real secrecy
as a railway timetable. Yes indeed they will have some Scottish input. Almost
anything in the USA from way back has a Scottish connection because there were
a lot of Scots there and very active.
I now confess
that I am the leader of a secret society. This one has the advantage of having
only one member, me, so as long as I keep quiet nobody will realise that I rule
the world; up to a point. So far the mission has not been entirely successful,
but something may turn up in the National Lottery. Also, I can skip the kit,
fiery crosses and bits of business usually needed.
Going back
down the ages humanity, mainly males for some reason, seem to have had a
yearning to get together in groups bent on the control of others, rule by force
and scratching each other's backs to ensure they have the big share of whatever
pot is going. This has often needed obscure rules, contests, ceremonies and the
whole bag. It might even explain Grand Opera.
Roman emperors
were good at this, with the difference that a lot of them liked their own
versions. Caligula was a case in point. His did not last because of the basic
rule that if anybody forgot the rules or got the words wrong they were
executed. Eventually, the few members that were left got rid of him and went
their own ways.
Yes, I have my
own angle on all this. All these secret societies etc. and some of the not so
secret give rise to all the many and various conspiracy theories of history.
These are false. The BBC should ignore them and start some real history into
the cock-ups that made the modern world. There is a rich choice to be had.
One is the
government decision to create a BBC.
I agree, the cock-up theory of history is worth exploring. Then at last we may finally have our definitive guide to the present.
ReplyDeleteThe arcane Demetrius?
ReplyDeleteMaybe if we roll that one round the mind a bit, it will 'grab'.