The Prime Minister and his
Deputy poodle have told us all that more effort is needed because of problems
with our security systems and the management of perceived risks. Cameron, with his rare gift for oratory and
insight talks of plugging holes to make it simple for us.
This is London now and I am
told that this is real data in real time.
The purpose may only be to help promote a video game for all to play, "Watch
Dogs", but it gives us all a chance to see what might be seen. How many of the populations of many countries
fully realise just how much is known and accessible to anyone with the kit and
the wit to use it.
My own basic assumption is
that it is possible that it is more or less all there open to view from the
time when computing power became substantial enough and all that goes online
became there to see and analyse. It is
not the basic information often that matters, it is the analysis and the
quality of it.
Between then and now,
depending on what date you think for the "then" there is a critical
difference. In the past a great deal of
material depended on other people's reports, opinions and perceptions. A good deal might be known or inferred from a
person's own behaviour and words, but this gave scope for misunderstanding or
deception.
Today, because of the
range of sources it is possible to judge people on their own actions, words and
other things. Where they shop, what they
buy, who they are in contact with and a wide range of social and working
activity are all there to be looked at and examined.
For those who know how to,
what to and are able to pull the information together we are all condemned, not
just out of our own mouths but in much of the detail of our lives and activity. A philosopher might have said a man is what
he eats, but certainly you cannot escape the contents of your supermarket
trolley or the contents of your freezer.
As for the wilder shores of social media and hasty mailing, never mind
comments or casual contacts you are banged to rights from your own evidence.
In the recent long trial
of newspaper people hacking around for stories "Private Eye" this
week has a telling comment. It seems
that one of the innocent's claims that they were not aware of all that was going
on was accepted by the jury. But the
person in question it is said regularly changed their Blackberries and other
devices after only short periods of use.
It is a strange world we
have where people routinely accept and use substantial amounts of data gained
not only from the recent past but in real time and are subject to extensive
coverage of their activities while in Parliament we are told that complex laws
and the rest are needed for basic state security.
Our notions about privacy
and being protected from enquiry in fact are very recent. In the past privacy was very rarely an option
for anyone. So all our new technology is
not just taking us into an unwanted future.
It could be restoring us
to the past. Now where did I put my
glasses?
No comments:
Post a Comment