The main thing about the
Cabinet and Government "reshuffle" is that it does not really matter
much in the great scheme of things. It
is thirty or so years ago now since the TV series "Yes Minister" and
"Yes Prime Minister" taught us that whatever we thought our
governments did not govern.
In the last couple of
centuries many Ministers have come and gone and quite a proportion have not
done much governing. In the days when
the propertied classes dominated for the most part they were expected to
preside. There have been many exceptions
but a lot of those are not thought well of.
Essentially, our
"Prime" minister, David Cameron is not a chancer as some suggest, he
is a gambler. Chancers may have an even
chance, or if lucky, win more often than they lost. Gamblers normally lose and Cameron's rate of
error and mischance puts him well into the category of gambler and loser.
A reason for Michael Gove
during his tenure at Education being so unpopular with teachers is that he did
try his hand at governing. If there is
one group of people who object to discipline and control it is the
teachers. By and large they detest being
told what to do and how to do it.
Whether he was right or
wrong or wise or foolish is something to argue about and this is a debate for
others. At least it tells the incomers
to office not to try doing anything like that but stick with the usual
business of acting as fixers for vested interests, spinners of media tales,
cheerleaders for anything that seems popular or keeps the media happy and
preparing the way for a lucrative career in consultancy and lobbying.
In any case if the experts
are right and we are bound by no less than 14,000 absolute commitments, the EU,
making laws on what are essentially policy matters and allowing the barmier
element of the judicial body to dictate what they think the law is, then our
ministers who may think of doing the odd bit of actual governing just to see
what it is like may not have much or any scope for action.
In any case, what can be
done in the few months before the next election is not much at best and it not
just a holding operation it is yet another high rolling political gamble to win
over the voters. In effect governing has
been given up apart from the occasional populist pretense.
Looking across the world
and what is happening there is a lot going on which may produce crises or
challenges that will test this new Cabinet and pose unwelcome choices. There are too many unknowns and too few good
omens.
Cameron, like too many of
our recent leaders has scant regard for history or its lessons and the
reshuffles and reshaping of Cabinets and Minister appointments in the past hopeful
of turning things round is not a happy one.
For us, the risks are
high, because if Cameron is again the loser it is us who will be the biggest
losers, saddled with a government that cannot govern because it does not know
how it, does not have time nor the wit to learn and is incapable of making
decisions that are wise or sensible.
Good summary. I agree about Gove. Right or wrong he was giving it a go. Nobody else will.
ReplyDeleteMrs OR says she votes for who will do the least damage. Ergo never for socialists.
ReplyDelete