The week has seen the
going of two prominent figures of The Left.
One of the present, Bob Crow of the RMT trade union, and one from the
past, Tony Benn, a former Minister and member of Labour Cabinets.
Quite how history will see
them is for the future. What paper trail and records Robert Crow will leave are likely to be scattered and may be
difficult to find. His history may well
be only that to be found in the media and a few files which may not tell the
whole story.
Benn, once a leading
figure in the Labour Party kept and collected a major archive. Also he scribbled frantically in his diary, books,
articles in journals and well as conducting extensive correspondence.
Few platforms of the hard
Marxist Left were without a speech from him, often many speeches. There is also a large film record. The effort will ensure that written and other
histories of the future of the politics of his time will make extensive use of
them.
To put it one way, when
those in the future attempt to travel to the past, Crow will be just a stop on
the line, Benn will be a major travel hub. The former was limited by his trade and
calling, the latter was given all the scope he needed.
Crow was a proud Plebian,
Benn was all too Patrician, a Red Prince who was at the beginning of the
takeover of the Labour Party by the intellectuals and the disaffected of the
upper classes.
What they did have in
common was the element of mysticism and devotion to dogma that characterised
the strong Marxist part of the Left.
Crow as a youngster was persuaded that the Soviet way was the future,
Benn was one of those, claiming to be of a philosophic mind, who persuaded him.
My view of Benn in the
past was that he was a "horse and cart" socialist, combining a
sentimental view of past work with a pretense that the form could still be kept
despite all the new ways that were replacing them.
The paternalism endemic in
the intellectual Left has led to so much of the muddle and confusion of the
present as well as the unwillingness to accept and tackle what is needed now
and in the immediate future.
The hatred of what they
saw as capitalism went along with the spending of massive state capital outlays
in ways that would never allow earnings on that investment.
At the end of it where
there were revenues you would be lucky to cover them, let alone earn much on
revenue costs. Our rail systems are one
of those, heavily subsidised and with little or no respite from the costs.
In 1851, Benn's forebear,
John Williams Benn, was in Hyde by Stockport, born just a few months earlier. His father, listed as a school master would move
to the East End of London a little later to do good works in Education.
At the same time in
Hammersmith there was a Robert Crow, just one month old, one of a number of
Crow families in London. This one would
grow up to be a grocer. Did our Robert
Crow have grocer's in his family like that of Margaret Thatcher?
One of the other quirks of
history is that the local public house where Marx first lived in England and where he discussed his ideas with others
was run by a man called George Osborne.
I wonder what Benn in his
diaries has made of our present George Osborne?
"Benn was all too Patrician, a Red Prince who was at the beginning of the takeover of the Labour Party by the intellectuals and the disaffected of the upper classes."
ReplyDeleteSpot on. I found Benn difficult to dislike, but knew it was worth the effort. The man was a menace.