There is a
three part series running on BBC1 about Jeremy Thorpe, once Leader of the former
Liberal Party into the 1970's who died recently in 2014 (born 1929). It deals
with matters we did not know at the time rather than the complex politics of
the period. A man was murdered and the case is still open.
What I did not
understand about Thorpe is why he went to the Liberals. Admittedly, in the
1950's there were many who thought that the party was a sleeping giant which
potentially could rise again and supplant one of the other two. But which was
the question. Theoretically, the Conservatives might have been the one to go
but Labour was seriously divided.
Had Thorpe
gone to Labour as one of the Westminster elite with the right education and
background he could well have made himself one of the intellectual cadre around
Hugh Gaitskell. These were men born to rule and often Sons Of The Raj. He could
have been a Prime Minister in waiting.
If he had
followed his family and lined up with the Tories then given the choices in that
party in 1974 when Heath bit the dust again he could have been one of their
candidates for Leader. Instead as Liberal Leader in 1974 after a tied election
he was made an offer he couldn't refuse by Heath, but did and we finished up
with Wilson and his minority government and then Callaghan.
The 1970's was
a strange world in our politics reflecting the times and not a good one. Wilson
was a number cruncher who could not add up who was forced to spend too much
time keeping the Labour party act together as the Stalinists and the social
welfare elements fought it out at conferences and in the constituencies.
Heath, a former
Brigadier lost to Aldershot, is best thought of as the Lord Cardigan (as in the
Charge of the Light Brigade) of British Politics. He would attack the wrong
targets at the wrong time in the wrong way. Our fears were that he was capable
of starting a nuclear war rather than admit he was wrong about anything,
notably British Rail.
It was an age
of three channel TV leaned on heavily by the major parties and a Fleet Street
whose newspapers were usually far more fiction than fact with stories that were
days old and experts with not only limited expertise but opinions based on
getting their stuff printed and paid for according to the whims of the owners.
Trying to read the press of that period is a grim business and the politicians
could be certain of protection rather than publication.
We had lost
our Empire, the Commonwealth was becoming an uncommon collection of
dictatorships, military appointed leaders and others who were there for the
conferences. We were a secondary state in the United Nations and NATO. The USA
regarded the Special Relationship as a kind of debt deferred fix.
We did not
know where were going or indeed where to go and in the confusion looked for any
friends anywhere with Thorpe at the front of the fleeing mob. So we rushed into
the arms of Brandt and Schmidt and Pompidou and d'Estaing and Europe sparing
the peasants the details.
None of whom
liked us or wanted us. But they did sell us cars, like the Fiat 132 in the
background of the picture from 1974. The 1800 model was flashy and good for the
ton on the motorways.
The teenage
toughs seem to be wearing Thorpe style clothing. This might tell us more about
Thorpe than about them.
I think you are probably right about Thorpe and the Liberals - he may have thought the party was a sleeping giant.
ReplyDeleteHe was never telegenic though - maybe he thought that didn't matter for Liberals.
Hat like a bookie's.
ReplyDeleteAs far as I recall, nobody was murdered. The charge was conspiracy to murder. The potential victim's dog was killed and that inspired the late Auberon Waugh to found the " Dog Lover's Party" to stand against Thorrpe. I can't recall the details but believe his election address or some of his leaflets were suppressed - rather in the way that news about the fate of Tommy Robinson was judicially suppressed more recently.
ReplyDelete