When one of
our governments finest thinking, policies for action, wide reforms or plans for
the future culminate in an inglorious shambles we are familiar with the way the
blame game begins to play out.
It is
invariably messy, sometimes vicious or nasty and the one certain thing is that
those responsible will be quick to accuse either their critics or anyone who is
unlucky enough to be passing by at the time .
The present
government is winding up to the next election and seeks to make us all happy,
that is if our vote counts. So we are having all the high minded rhetoric about
wonders of the future to come. The opposition have to come with schemes that sound
better, at least in the media and its connections.
But who are
the crucial people in all this? The media want us to believe it is them and
their political affiliates and are very persuasive, money no option, 20 billion
more for the NHS, the cheque is in the post. What is left of our political
parties out there find themselves at pop fests with celeb's and believe this is
the way.
The Civil
Service, anxious to justify its numbers, vast cost and above all pension
schemes lay their claim and inevitably those in Education put up their hands to
say it is all down to use, chuck the loot and the money this way, and then add
a bit, and then another bit.
Add to this
major organisations of one kind of another, pressure groups, trade unions,
Women's Institutes and the Society For Restoring Everything and the claims are
big, wide and large. Most of the population seems to be in there with their
hands out for all the quantitative easing to be had.
But
the truth can now be told as this LSE article suggests. It is all, or at
least mostly, down to the Knowledge Brokers, the new gang on the block who take
the politicians etc. down the yellow brick road of policy making to a better
and happier future, at least for them.
But,
would you let your daughter/son marry one?
If we change "evidence-informed policymaking" to "policy-informed evidence making" we'll be even closer to reality.
ReplyDeleteI'd have thought the extra £20 billion was already planned for because of an increasing population and especially a growing population of elderly people.
ReplyDelete