As Syria
continues in chaos, war and destruction we have those who declare that now is
the time to send in our troops. Even
Tony Blair has popped up to show us his fangs and need for blood again. But this is one question that might be asked,
what troops?
Firstly, just
how many? A couple of hundred or so is
not enough. We are talking about brigade
strength at least. Assuming that they
are intended to see action and take the field rather than acting as a defence
garrison behind the lines then there is a limit to the amount of time they can
be deployed.
So we have a
brigade that after a period will need to be withdrawn and placed in reserve for
re-manning, needing new equipment and
possibly an element of re-training. This
means that there has to be another brigade to replace them and fully prepared
for conflict.
As the first
brigade will have suffered casualties and other men will need to be withdrawn,
then there will have to be other troops either in reserve or in the UK
available. These will have to had all
the basic and essential training.
Also, to have
a brigade in action entails a large body of support troops for all the
logistics and other crucial services necessary to the conduct of any
campaign. This will not be a static body
and also requires other troops to be available for any added or crisis services
or for routine turnover and change.
But Syria would
be just one commitment. The Army has
other jobs to do and other problems in the world to deal with. It also has the key role of simply being
there, ready and waiting to defend the UK from any of the many and various
threats that could emerge.
One issue that
too few comprehend, especially politicians and media people is that the troops
who see action can only do so much. So
at any given time, a proportion of the troops on strength will be in the last
period of service and will and should be going.
Another is
that when you send troops into theatre either for action or where action is
probable they need to have had the training etc. So a number of your troops are not yet ready
and still going through the training.
These days because of the technical matters this takes longer than in
the past.
This means is
that given the present overall number of troops in our Army it is not possible
to deploy even a brigade force to Syria without taking serious risks of one
kind or another.
What is worse
is that given the present structure of supply it is probable that any sustained
period of action could mean that the troops could soon be at a point when they
do not have the weapons, the equipment and the key technical kit to do the job.
And they may
well run out of boots.
The trouble is, no politician can put all that into a soundbite. Many probably don't even know what a brigade is.
ReplyDeleteSo same, same as with Iraq. All mouth and no boots, as it were.
ReplyDelete