While the
media is throwing a hissy fit over the Royal family, purely incidentally our
Heads of State, there is the question of Prince Philip.
Quite why a 94
year old, not in good shape and prone to lapses of the mind into an earlier
life like so many aged persons, is not allowed to live quietly and gently I do
not understand.
He has done 63
years before the mast, using a seafaring analogy, with time before that on
Royal duties and before that was a junior naval officer who saw active service
against Hitler's forces.
I have already
said that you might take the junior naval officer out of the Navy, but you
cannot take the Navy out of the junior naval officer.
My personal
experience of seeing him in action in a couple of major conferences is of a man
who turned up in a hurry, read the script in a direct manner and then left in a
hurry to his next diary entry. It is not
much go on.
But my feeling
is that I would not have liked to work with or for him and he certainly would
not have wanted me to after probably a very short period. I would have asked too many questions, am
prone to flippancy and he is not very good, I suspect, of meaningful in depth analysis and discussion.
It is the age
factor, however, we should remember.
When my father was going on and around 90, when taking him out we were
always in holy terror of his making remarks which might have been amusing in
the 1920's but which did not suit at all modern feelings. His time on the docks and in prize fighting
gave, let us say, an edge to his humour.
At least I was
used to this. My grandfather whose
thinking derived from the 1890's also had ideas, views and a sense of humour
that was distinctly different from that of the etiquette of the 1920's and later.
His was honed
by four years in the trenches. There
were also family members from the decades before with ideas not of their time
by the 1940's.
But now I am
old and trying very hard to button my lips at the moments when my young or teenage
self attempts to escape from the back of the brain.
If it is very
busy around me, or there is some stress or if I have lost track of the moment
or am just tired and fed up, the embarrassing mistake is very easy to make, the
words just pop out.
It is much
easier and better if the occasion is one where there is not much to be said and
then as little as possible, preferably in a clearly structured form where you
only have to stick to the script. It may
be the formality that is out of fashion these days but it is a lot safer.
Better still,
is to stay away from any sort of modern media event or public situation where with
today's kit any moment, trip or slip or error is out there for all the world to
see and to complain about.
Above all, do
not ask me to sing after a stiff jug or two, it will have not just the family
but everyone running for the exits.
My father could be embarrassing by the time he reached 90. In many respects his world was more robust and forthright in ways we can barely even describe today.
ReplyDeleteMy father died of stomach cancer at the age of thirty-nine.
ReplyDeleteI have a photograph of him standing with an oppo in a desolated Japanese town. I'm not sure if it is Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
They are smiling.
Philip has done his duty in many, many ways and still does. He's a man of his time, so he voices things which are wonderfully out of step with today's League of the Perpetually Offended.
ReplyDelete