You pays your money and
you place your bets. On the one hand the
Global Sustainability Institute suggests that Britain is close to running out
of oil, gas and coal. The government
Department of Energy and Climate Change promptly rubbished their views.
The BBC Report of the row briefly
indicates the battle lines. It is not a
subject for me to discuss in detail. A
modest search of the web will reveal umpteen learned papers, policy documents,
expert discussion and the rest. My own
view is that what we want we will not get and what we would like is not on
offer.
In the mid 20th Century
while in gross terms there was still coal in the ground, because not all coal
is the same it appeared that some types were becoming shorter in supply so
costing rather more and others had disadvantages that included costs of
treatment to make useful.
Because of the central
role coal had played in industry, trade and much of life its mining had become
highly political. Also, because coal extraction
was located in particular communities the electoral system delivered many Members
of Parliament who were there to defend the existing coal industry literally at
all costs as were the relevant trade unions.
That there was an
emotional side to this is significant.
The picture above is of the memorial to those who died at the Hickleton
Main Colliery. There are names there
which are known. The effects in this one
source of fuel resource alone took decades to resolve and injected serial
bitterness, disputes and economic consequences that are still with us today.
Because politically the
issues were simplified to political sound bites and forced into ideological
dogmas for analysis it prevented both real understanding or any serious vision
of the scale and nature of the changes that were under way in both the provision
and technology and a lot else of fuel and energy supplies.
So in the present debate
both sides are right and both sides are wrong.
It is right that because of our greed and wasteful use of resources they
might diminish sharply in supply and at a high cost. What happens when is an interesting question.
We are wrong if we think
we can manage or deal with rapid and radical change easily given our existing
political frameworks, lobbying systems and arcane backward looking governments. Relentless short termism and promises to be paid for in an improbable future were all part of the routines.
As in the mid 20th Century
the old and existing jobs, plant, working systems, technology, management,
control, financial and political effects will change whether we like it or not.
Given past experience we are very likely to make
matters worse rather than better.
"We", Demetrius? They, surely.
ReplyDeleteCough, cough, we use fifty and more gallons a year just for basic day to day shopping
ReplyDeleteI suspect the best option for the UK was nuclear, but it's too late now.
ReplyDelete