Having had
the serious part of yesterday seeing what happened in The Tour de France time
trial it was time to wind down. A Jessye
Norman reference in the TV guide looked like an interesting musical item.
Wrong again
it turned out to be Jesse Norman, male, at the Hay Festival talking to Daniel
Kahneman (see Wikipedia). He is a Nobel
Prize winner for his work in applying behavioural psychology to economics.
He did a
spell as a conscript in the Israeli army which would have been useful to him in
his later work. In an army there is a
reason for everything which determines how you are expected to behave. This is always irrational.
His work is
extensive and complicated and arising from a basis in another discipline
suggests that many essential assumptions in economics and amongst economists
are untenable in practice and unworkable as any basis for policies.
When I was
told fifty odd years ago that econometrics, mathematics based economics was the
certain future, I had doubts. It is a
pity that too few others did.
After that relaxing hour a programme on another channel caught the eye. It was on the PBS channel fromAmerica , one of
a series covering the financial meltdown of 2008. It concentrated on the collapse of Bear
Stearns, the failure of Lehmann and the bail out of AIG.
After that relaxing hour a programme on another channel caught the eye. It was on the PBS channel from
It was
entertaining to see so many of the best and brightest in Wall Street and Washington DC
getting it so badly wrong. They gave London a good run for the
money in the quest for turning shambles into disasters. Underlying the coverage was the constant
question, why did they do this?
Whilst
Kahneman’s work would not give the precise answers his thinking about how
individuals make economic decisions, the imperatives which drive people and the
force of group think offered many insights.
Now it is
becoming increasing clear that the idea that the figures have been constantly
fiddled big time and people led to or dragooned into believing them is not just
the cynicism of the few but the reality of what has been happening.
So not only
did all the governments and related authorities know little in terms of having
the technical expertise of working experience in the areas of finance that went
wrong, but most of the data on which they claimed to be making rational
decisions was hopelessly flawed or faked.
In any case
their brains were not set up for rational thinking in the first place.
"Whilst Kahneman’s work would not give the precise answers his thinking about how individuals make economic decisions, the imperatives which drive people and the force of group think offered many insights."
ReplyDeleteI'm always suspicious. Economics seems to sprout gurus like no other field.
Crooks are crooks, regardless from which area of human activity they are spawned. Ergo the political, banker and corporate lot are no more than common criminals with posh lifestyles.
ReplyDelete