In the media,
especially the "news" papers, a good many items these days are sourced from web sites that often are not
attributed. Science Daily is one favourite to be raided.
This is
one I picked up when checking it out entitled "Consumer and industrial
products now a dominant urban air pollution source".
"We've
reached that transition point already in Los Angeles," It might explain some other things.
The conclusion
is:
McDonald said.
He and his colleagues found that they simply could not reproduce the levels of
particles or ozone measured in the atmosphere unless they included emissions
from volatile chemical products.
In the course
of that work, they also determined that people are exposed to very high
concentrations of volatile compounds indoors, which are more concentrated
inside than out, said co-author Allen Goldstein, from the University of
California Berkeley.
"Indoor
concentrations are often 10 times higher indoors than outdoors, and that's
consistent with a scenario in which petroleum-based products used indoors
provide a significant source to outdoor air in urban environments."
The new
assessment does find that the U.S. regulatory focus on car emissions has been
very effective, said co-author Joost de Gouw, a CIRES chemist. "It's
worked so well that to make further progress on air quality, regulatory efforts
would need to become more diverse," de Gouw said.
"It's not just vehicles any more."
Unquote.
There is
another thing, how many people are paying a good deal of money out for stuff
they do not really need?
Yes, the atmosphere in the home can be far more polluted than outside. Research seems sparse and fragmented though.
ReplyDeleteThe last paragraph is part of the ongoing resistance to irrelevance.
ReplyDelete