In the many
forgotten parts of history are the various military organisations and formations of the past. When there was
little or no policing in many parts of Britain this entailed military units to
contain any revolutionary movements who might use force.
The plan of
raising Fencible Corps in the Highlands was first proposed and carried into
effect by Mr Pitt (afterwards the Earl of Chatham), in the year 1759. During
the three preceding years both the fleets and armies of Great Britain had suffered
reverses, and to retrieve the situation great efforts were necessary.
In England
county militia regiments were raised for internal defence in the absence of the
regular army; but it was not deemed prudent to extend the system to Scotland,
the inhabitants of which, it was supposed, could not yet be safely entrusted
with arms.
Groundless as
the reasons for this caution undoubtedly were in regard to the Lowlands , it would certainly have been hazardous at a
time when the Stuarts and their adherents were still plotting a restoration to
have armed the clans.
An exception,
however, was made in favour of the people of Argyll and Sutherland, and
accordingly letters of service were issued to the Duke of Argyll, then the most
influential and powerful nobleman in Scotland , and the Earl of
Sutherland to raise, each of them, a Fencible regiment within his district.
Unlike the
militia regiments which were raised by ballot, the Fencibles were to be raised
by the ordinary mode of recruiting, and like the regiments of the line, the
officers were to be appointed and their commissions signed by the king.
The same
system was followed at different periods down to the year 1799, the last of the
Fencible regiments having been raised in that year.
The following
is a list of the Highland Fencible regiments according to the chronological
order of the commissions, with the date of their embodiment and reduction:-
The Argyll
Fencibles (No. 1), 1759 - 1763
The Sutherland
Fencibles (No. 1) 1759 - 1763
The Argyll or Western Fencibles (No. 2), 1778 - 1783
The Gordon
Fencibles, 1773 - 1783
The Sutherland
Fencibles (No. 2) 1779 - 1783
The Grant or
Strathspey Fencibles (three battalions), 1793 - 1799
The Breadalane
Fencibles (three battalions),1793, 1794-1799 and 1802
The Sutherland
Fencibles (No. 3) 1793- 1797
The Gordon
Fencibles (No. 2), 1793 - 1799
The Argyll
Fencibles (No. 1), 1793 - 1797
The Rothesay
and Caithness Fencibles (two battalions), 1794 and 1795 - 1802
The Dumbarton
Fencibles, 1794 - 1802
The Reay
Fencibles, 1794 - 1802
The
Inverness-shire Fencibles, 1794 - 1802
The Fraser
Fencibles, 1794 - 1802
The Glengarry
Fencibles, 1794 - 1802
The Caithness Legion, 1794 - 1802
The Perthshire
Fencibles (No. 4), 1794 - 1802
Argyll
Fencibles (No. 4), 1794 - 1802
Lochaber
Fencibles, 1799 - 1802
The
Clan-Alpine Fencibles, 1796 - 1802
The Ross-shire
Fencibles, 1796-1802
Regiment of
the Isles, or Macdonald Fencibles, 1799.
Argyll
Fencibles (No. 5) 1796 - 1802.
The Ross and
Cromarty Rangers, 1799 - 1802
The Macleod
Fencibles, 1799 - 1802
This was drawn
from The Military History Index a few years ago. When you add the numbers of
men in such regiments to those in the regular Army and Royal Navy it can bring
you up to proportions of the male population in service equivalent to those of
the two recent World Wars.
Moreover, the
units were not located in their home areas but sent elsewhere. Who better than
Scots to police the Irish and the English?
"the inhabitants of which, it was supposed, could not yet be safely entrusted with arms"
ReplyDeletePrudent. They were Fencibles after all.
Were the units independent, thereby making them indyfencibles?
ReplyDelete"it can bring you up to proportions of the male population in service equivalent to those of the two recent World Wars."
ReplyDeleteInteresting, but on reflection perhaps not a surprise.