It is tempting
to suggest that Donald Trump could be described as a Scot who has somehow strayed into American
politics but not quite accurate. Whether
it would be unfair to the Scots or to Trump is a matter for a debate I would
prefer to avoid. Nevertheless, there is
that touch of Scots acerbity and directness in his approach to the issues in his
Presidential campaign. There is a reason
for this.
Donald's Scottish
Ancestors are described here. His mother was Mary Ann MacLeod (or McLeod)
from the Western Isles. This is a notable Highland Clan that turns up in my own
ancestry, albeit from another island at a distance. We should take into account the marriages and
other branches that extend the connections.
To see where
those of the Macleod name lived in Scotland in the 19th Century there is this
diagram. The family history buffs know
that there are close cousins of immediate family, near cousins from say three
or four previous generations before and then all the outer cousins and
relations from earlier generations.
Mary was a
Christian name favoured among the Macleod's, the fact that state registration
did not begin in Scotland until 1855 and problems of trying to find people in
parish registers of variable quality and accuracy means that there are many
unknowns out there. It is a fair guess
that Trump will have many among the ordinary people, some of who may have done interesting
things.
There is a chance
that some relation or other was with the British Army at Waterloo or perhaps at
Bladensburg and Washington earlier; or at sea with Nelson's navy. DNA testing of those with the surname has led
to claims many have a common parentage, if distant in time.
Then there are
the ones that he might not want to be one of the wider family. John Law, an economist, 1761 to 1729,
Wikipedia, is a person that he might want to avoid. Another might be the James Sturgeon, a butter
merchant, bankrupted in Glasgow in the summer of 1865. Evidently a slippery business with other
peoples' money being lost.
When the Trump
nomination was being flagged as a no-hoper by experts, Prime Minister Cameron
went in for some cheap virtue signalling in intervening with some critical
comments. He really is an expert in
creating problems for himself in the future.
What this means is that if there is a President Trump, then he will have
a President of the USA to deal with who will want to pay close attention to
Scottish affairs, indeed someone with a lot of hard cash already invested
there. If Cameron can intervene in
American politics then Trump can repay the compliment.
Even if Trump
fails to win Office, he might well to chose to give his attention to this
field. He is a man who does deals and
there are plenty to be done north of the border. Quite what, who will be involved and to what
purpose who knows?
"He really is an expert in creating problems for himself in the future."
ReplyDeleteYou are right. At times he seems to play the political game quite well but he makes too many glaring blunders to be taken seriously.