There has been
an ongoing discussion about removing statues and memorials to persons of the
past whose views are not in accord with those of larger or smaller groups of
people of the present.
It is claimed
that any group or even person who feels offended should have the right of
removal.
There is one
person, famous in his day, who has been held in esteem by many and has statues
put up in his honour in great places to promote his ideas and persuade people
of their worth.
But there are
aspects to his work that should make us think.
He was central
to the foundation of an organisation known as The Society for the Suppression
of vice which became of high standing and a major influence on policy in its
time.
Their purposes
included:
The hounding
and gaoling of sex workers.
Abolishing and
penalising the enjoyment of alcohol.
Tough laws
against atheists and other non-believers.
The banning of
all non-Christian publications.
Banning the innocent amusements of gambling.
Stopping
contraception and the teaching of human biology to the lower classes.
Among other similar
idea's being highly restrictive of diversity in religion, belief and our modern
norms of society.
For many it
must be intolerable that a man not just holding views of this kind but
promoting them widely should now be respected or celebrated.
Take down the
statues of William Wilberforce.
I wonder if Cameron or Corbyn will ever have statues erected in their honour.
ReplyDeleteIn George St, Edinburgh, is a statue commemorating the Prince Regent's tentative visit to Scotland propelled by Wattie Scott in a tartanfest of forelock tugging; upon this edifice is the inscription:
ReplyDeleteGEORGE IV VISITED SCOTLAND MDCCCXXII
About ten years ago, in black spray paint was neatly printed "Good for him".
Instead of being chiseled into the stone it was cleaned off. Pity.