Would anyone
at the time of the Civil Wars in the Atlantic Isles in the mid 17th Century
have imagined the scale, power and authority of the British Empire of just a
few generations later? Even after The
Restoration of 1660 the Dutch sailed into the Medway in 1667 to inflict a major
defeat on the navy.
Going back
into antiquity, there was a time when every schoolboy would be expected to know
the story of Rome, how it was founded and later became The Glory That Was
Rome. How many of these classical
notions embedded themselves into our ideas systems is a question of political
philosophy but it certainly loomed large.
In the history
of mankind in recent millennia there have been many empires of one kind or
another that have come and gone. In some
cases there is knowledge and awareness of their history, however sketchy. But there are others about which we know little
and understand less.
The one
certainty is that there have been many and various and now there is endless
academic and other debate about some of those past empires, their nature,
purpose, function, legacy and how "good" or "bad" they may
have been. This will depend on the moral
and other perspectives of those doing the debating.
There are
other issues which seem certain and that is that the human past in political
terms has been rarely peaceful. Empires
on the one hand and even mutually
dependent tribal societies have been in constant conflict that defy rationality
or any moral sense.
The 1914
discussions at present have at their heart the issue of why a handful of
European nations who had taken control over much of the world then decided to
ruin themselves, begin to lose their empires and inflict disaster on so many
peoples.
We do not
learn, if anything it is more convenient to forget. Russia having suffered serious damage by 1918
took another World War to reinstate and expand in the shape of the Soviet Union
and its satellites. When that empire of
the mind and military fell apart it lost much of its territory.
Now we have a
European Union, dominated by the same nations that triggered the 1914 debacle,
attempting to assert itself by corralling in former Soviet entities into its
empire of the mind and money. If
President Putin does shut the pipelines for their energy supplies it is the
least he can do. The other is to use
Russian money flows to disrupt the fragile and vulnerable EU financial systems.
Meanwhile, in
the Middle East there is ISIS. It might
seem ridiculous to suggest that this grouping of violent, aggressive and
believers in an old and severe thought system could ever be more than a threat
to civil order, peace and the existing mind worlds of the West. But trawl back through enough of known
history it is possible.
Given that
there are many political entities; I avoid the word "civilisation"
given the violence quotient of so many of them; of the past that began in very
small ways and then either slowly or quickly gained control over many peoples
and territories anything could happen.
All it needs
is for those who are infiltrated, suborned, and made to fear, to be weak,
divided, crippled by beliefs and ideas that prevent either a coherent or
effective defence and distracted by things that dominate their thinking and
lives and they can sooner or later be brought to subjection and made not simply
subordinate but in effect enslaved.
In particular,
entities which are profoundly divided and muddled in their thinking about those
divisions and are more concerned to fight each other rather than the intruders,
disregarding them as a real threat and failing to understand their potential
for dominance, that can find themselves taken over.
There was a
time when the British took over the Sub Continent of India. Just how many men did it take to assert
control over such a large part of the earth and so many peoples?
Definitely food for thought.
ReplyDeleteIronically, an important threat seems to be the global push to eliminate threats - all threats from disease to conflict, from food additives to the climate.
ReplyDelete