The news about the weather
and the railways had me reaching for my July 1922 and 1863 copies of
Bradshaw. The damage done at Dawlish
where the old Great Western Railway main line goes by the sea through tunnels
and embankments is going to be a big job to repair.
My view is that it will
cost a lot more and take a lot longer than is being said. In a brief piece about the cost and future
there was passing mention of an inland alternative.
This does not need to be a
new line because there are disused lines
for an inland route. There was a line
out of Exeter that connected at Heathfield to the Newton Abbot to
Moretonhampstead line.
Given the existing costs
of maintaining the coastal line, already known for delays in bad weather, it
may be that the cost of reinstating the old inland lines as a fast route plus
the comparative maintenance costs could be economic in the long term. It is an interesting question.
It is understandable that
the coast route in the past may have had enough local traffic and originally
there was development to be sponsored but that is no longer the case. These coastal places are now pensioner and
benefits enclaves. The old coastal route
could be handed over to a heritage group.
The fact that lines to the
west were cut down to one two track line was because of the vagaries of railway
decision making in the past. Back in the
1970's it would have made sense to use the inland route rebuilt with fast
tracks.
But British Rail then had
lost interest in passengers and any fast lines other than the two Scottish main
line routes and the Brighton Line for the media people and Administrative Class
civil servants.
If you want to see what
this line was then Disused Railway Stations has the answer
in relation to Heathfield Station that connected with both Exeter and Newton
Abbot. Basically, it was used like other
options elsewhere as a freight line with limited slow passenger services in
this case that closed before Beeching.
Given the layout of the
western counties and their need for reliable fast services to London quite why
they were cut back down to one line only and that on a vulnerable coastal line better
served by stopping local trains is one of those mysteries of transport policy.
It may be the time to
revisit the past and work out what kind of railway and backup lines might be
best in the future. This may not happen
because all eyes and the money are fixed on a fourth route to Birmingham that
might save all of thirty minutes, if you do not allow any time taken to go to
and from the stations.
This weekend's weather might make the decision for them.
Do you really think our governing classes capable of such reasoned logic as yours, Demetrius?
ReplyDelete"It may be the time to revisit the past and work out what kind of railway and backup lines might be best in the future."
ReplyDeleteI agree. Do we really need to save those minutes between Birmingham and London? Surely slower trains are more efficient anyway - energy wise.