The grand
debate about bikinis, burkinis and beach clothing in general seems at first a
little bizarre, having been on a number of French beaches in the long past. I recall an English lady who enjoyed sea air,
but her skin being very sensitive to the sun she had to be fully covered and
shaded.
I suspect that
had something like a burkini been available she would have been delighted to
wear it. Whilst the beaches were graced
with many ladies, young and not quite so young, with minimal bikinis or less
there were a good many others. For the media it is an excuse for lots of
pictures of female flesh.
There were
those who preferred earlier designs of swim suits and others who needed more
support or for whom age, childbirth or operations meant they preferred being
covered. There were ladies who preferred
more coverage for their own reasons.
Also, then the beaches were free of ultra loud noise and untrained
children.
These were the
public beaches. There were other beaches
that were private or designated that had their own ways of keeping any
conformity that was expected. It was
usually clear which was which and you paid your money, or not, and you took
your choice. But a new report suggests
that this is not now the case.
The
confrontation at a beach in the Bordeaux area between naturists, perhaps designated
for them by a naturist centre, and a group of young men, perhaps theoretically
French but of different origins may mean a great deal more trouble to come.
Before the
idea has been in some European countries that it does not matter what
causes some females, or males, to prefer fuller or lesser coverage, all they
are doing is taking time out and with luck having a splash or a swim.
It may be a
past that will not return. As the
picture above from 1864 shows it took generations before sun and beach lovers
in Europe shed most or all or nearly all in the name of freedom under the sun
and soon they may be obliged to cover up again.
Whether they
like it or not.
Dear Martin Scriblerus blogger.
ReplyDeleteDioclese one of you fellow members runs a website called www.is-a-cunt.com, the idea behind the website is to troll public figures by "cunting them", especially women who he degrades and abuses by means of fake porn pictures with degrading disgusting comments encouraged by fellow trolls who are hiding by anonymous names.
Other sick and twisted themes of the blog is a guessing game who will die next and celebrating the winner whilst mocking the dying with sick comments, death threats , rape instructions, its all there on the website.
Anything goes, everything is allowed....celebrity deaths probably get the most abusive comments..
Marting Scriblerus has its very own troll...pop along to www.is-a-cunt.com , cunt and fuck with the trolls.
Not quite the exclusive club Martin Scriblerus has appointed itself as. .....grown men hiding behind silly childish names abusing women.
Dioclese the sick troll.
I remember woollen bathing trunks which sagged alarmingly when wet.
ReplyDeleteIt's possibly best for all concerned if I keep my gear on. Otherwise, it would terrify the children.
ReplyDeleteThanks to A. Nonnymus for the link; I hadn't visited the site and found a lot of it a real giggle.
ReplyDelete