My personal
Philistinism, if you can call it that, is not taking certain propositions on
trust in matters relating to the arts.
But something has turned up; that is dug up, by archaeologists in
Palestine that suggest that the Philistines of old were quite a civilised and
decent bunch.
The Seattle Times has a short succinct article on the discovery at
Ashkelon of hundreds of remains of the Philistine people which on examination
in detail will tell more. It is said
that they were non-Semitic and originated as migrants from across the sea to
the North and were diverse from the settled tribes of Palestine of the time.
The famous
story is that of David and Goliath, a Philistine, and we have long been taught
to admire and applaud the courage and ability of David to do him down by
tactical thinking.
Many men since
have been called David, although not all have turned out to be quite as
admirable. The findings, however, do call into question the story line we have
been given in The Bible. Indeed, we seem
to have anti-migrant racism.
The picture
above is of The Annals of The Bible owed to Archbishop James Ussher, see in
full in the Wikipedia entry
who dated the creation of the world to 22 October 4004 BC. This has been
disputed; "experts" called "scientists" and such who are
best ignored.
How can this
be dealt with? According to our deeply
correct leading universities of today there is only one answer. That is to ban The Bible and related
literature that is sympathetic to it. A
real public statement could be made by the universities burning their books.
They could
chuck a few bishops on the fires as well to make the point.
When it comes to David and Goliath we'll never know the full story. The betting markets for example - did Goliath take a dive?
ReplyDeleteWhy stop there at banning? Burn 'em all in the public square, incarcerate and torture anyone caught hiding a bible in his home, string 'em up I say.
ReplyDelete