It may have
escaped your notice that there was a high level shindig in Paris in which world
leaders agreed to change the climate.
The essence of
their talks was their concern that climate might change, as it has done so
often in the past, so they were going to ensure it stayed the same for all
time, or at least until the next elections.
We could all ignore them of course and do it yourself.
It would mean
going to bed a lot earlier, ceasing to buy lots of rubbish consumer goods which
are soon discarded, changing some of our lazier and thoughtless habits, walk a
lot more and above all, stop tourism.
In the UK and
its highest levels of government the issue of runway space in the South East is
consuming a great deal of time, effort and money. One lot say we want another runway at
Heathrow, to make it a mega hub, others want it at Gatwick, and there are other
options relating to the many airfields in the area.
But it is
pointed out that one of the main uses of these places is to fly UK people out
to tourist destinations and to fly other people in to be tourists in England
and other parts of the UK. Tourism, once
a quaint and limited pastime for those with more money than sense has become
almost obligatory for many people.
There are many
places where it has become the central and key economic activity but with low
level work. As this activity means
simply churning money round the system and is highly vulnerable to changing
fashion, it is not a form of real investment simply extended low level
consumption.
What is missed
in our assessments of its worth is the sheer scale of the damage inflicted on
many of the eco-systems and vulnerable parts of the planet as well as it's
command of scarce resources. Also, it is
common for many areas to subsidise the activity.
If you add up
all the airfield provision, tax breaks and support for airlines and plane
makers and a few other things, it is possibly one of the most highly subsidised
trades on earth. The taxpayers are helping
people to wreck the planet.
What is
interesting about the Paris Conference is that much, if not all, of what
happened there could have been done online.
I was thinking about this not so long ago. One could argue that the Wright brothers invented something we would have been better off without.
ReplyDeleteAh, but if it was not for all the tourism, the eco-warriors would not know that the planet was a beautiful place, worthy of being 'saved'.
ReplyDeleteBest regards
"world leaders agreed to change the climate"
ReplyDeleteCome back, Canute, all is forgiven.