We live in a
world where the media means spin and where it is the spin that matters in order
to make people believe your particular line or dogma. A choice example this week was on the subject
of wind turbines and their impact on the neurology and function of the brain.
This
brief article in the Telegraph is about a Dr. Koch and his thoughts on
whether the low frequency sound generated by them is more complex that we
thought with possible effects on the brain.
The wind turbine industry was quick to respond, there is a
lot of money and profit to be had to be gained from persuading governments to
put as many of them up as possible.
Quote:
RenewableUK’s Director of Onshore Renewables, Gemma
Grimes: “The wind industry takes all health and safety issues very seriously.
This piece of work was, by the author’s own admission, just him thinking aloud
and raising a number of possible issues relating to all types of infrastructure
that could be researched further - he undertook no research at wind farms.
The author himself stated that it would be scaremongering
to make any a connection between wind farms and public health issues. There is
an existing body of peer-reviewed scientific research, which clearly shows that
living near a wind farm has no adverse effect on anyone’s health, and to
suggest otherwise is inaccurate and irresponsible”.
Unquote.
In short, put up and shut up. All the science is done and no more is needed
or wanted. If you do not the
Congregation Of The Climate Change Faith will get you. However, there is the delicate question of was
this science to any degree sponsored and funded by the industry or bodies
sympathetic to wind turbines for energy.
Also, there has been the unravelling of the BBC spin on
the Cabinet's plans for its reform and reorganisation. Rather than the posse of the famous on their payroll riding to the rescue it
seems that the BBC top managers provided the horses and forage and gave the
directions.
For the ordinary watcher and listener to all this all we
seem to have is a barrage of endless and confusing spin. Smoke, mirrors, sleight of hand and words,
facts that are not facts, science that is not science, data that is not
reliable data, statistics where the only connection to real statistics is the
use of numerals and worse dogmas or beliefs removed from reality are all we are
getting.
For those of us with the time, experience and interest at
least the web offers some hope of finding other views and information. But there is far too little time to chase and
analyse all that is needed to so we are all left wondering what we can believe or
understand.
You cannot have a real democracy where the media, politics
and major sources of information are essentially the spin put out by those with
the facilities, money and economic interest.
Now it is all at least tarnished if not useless because of the lies and
falsities.
But we seem to be already in a world where democracy is
dead.
There is a divide between science, data and facts on the one hand and sponsored narratives on the other. Anything of political or commercial importance seems to be affected by it.
ReplyDeleteThe BBC should be highlighting the difference between sponsored narratives and reality but in many areas it doesn't.