The idea that
some of the current notions about populations and demographics have become more
a militant religion than anything scientific or philosophical has gained a
little ground.
DNA and Genetics study can be regarded as racist in France says this
article in The Independent. A University
of Leicester group ventured into France to research evidence of Viking traces
in the present population of Normandy.
The team was
led by Dr. Richard Jones whose interests are:
Quote:
"My research focuses on the complex and changing relationships
which existed between people and the land between c. 400 and c. 1500 AD.
It centres on examining how the landscape was exploited both as an economic
resource, and as a medium through which personal and community identities
(particularly of the non-elite) were negotiated, forged and reinforced.
Other research themes include: the early medieval origins of English
villages and the take-up and spread of open-field farming; medieval manure; the
impact of Scandinavian settlement on the English countryside; and rural
depopulation as a stimulus for landscape change."
Unquote.
The University of Leicester is now among the top 1% in the world, one of
the reasons being its extensive and critical work in genetics especially
related to medical conditions and disease.
So if they did find a glitch in the DNA related to any of this they
could be marched off to the guillotine.
They did not
expect to find mobs of large armed men hanging round street corners or roaming
around pillaging and sacking and taking over anything that can be taken over. It is identifiable bits in the DNA that are
sought to see what might be made of them.
At best they
will find around two per cent, top, of DNA lurking in the corners of a small
number of the existing population. What
this might indicate concerns the pattern of human movements around 1200 years
ago, give or take a century or two.
But the French
are not happy about this. They might
accept that the Northmen came and conquered long ago, but it seems are
unwilling to accept that the French of today have anything to do with them and
wish to ban the testing on the grounds that there are things statistics should
not be applied to.
I assume that
the bones of Pierre-Simon Laplace (see Wikipedia) will be removed from his tomb
in Normandy soon by members of the Academie Francaise and burned at the stake
for his heresies in applying statistics to probability studies.
But France,
along with other EU countries currently has other people movement issues that are
giving problems that are very much in the news.
These are not easily dealt with or resolved and are increasing in scale
without much hope of checking it.
This scale of movement reported by Bloomberg deals with the now and the
gross numbers. The comparison with 1945
brings back to memory the many I knew in the years after who were part of it
and the scale of impact.
Only in the
1940's the world population was around less than a third of that today. Even so
in that period the UK, for example, was encouraging emigration as a means of
tackling the housing, jobs and social provision crises that existed.
Such movement
on the present scale and greater has been potential for decades for all the
usual reasons, see the history of the last few millennia, but because of our
faith in mid 20th Century dogma's there has been a reluctance to admit it.
It is likely
to increase from the 73 million estimated in the last four years with the
potential for much more and if the past really is a guide it could increase on
a compound basis.
It is not just
war and internal conflict, for example, a run of monsoon failures could lead to
major shifts and many parts of the world are said to be running short of fresh water.
California is
one place where the problems of water have become urgent. This is where the population went from around
one million to around forty million in seven generations. It could go back down again soon.
So will we
open our doors to the poor, lost and huddled masses of California?
Now where is
my old helmet, chain mail and battle axe?
Politics trumps science again.
ReplyDelete