Meanwhile the
property boom goes on and on. One effect
is that a street in central London that housed hundreds a century ago now
houses tens at best, when they are there, which is less and less often in that
the properties are bought for investment and not used.
Around the
country in rural and seaside areas there are all the second, and third and in
some cases fourth homes. Again all much
less occupied these days. Add to that
the sprawling mid 20th Century estates, private and public, once housing families
now with many houses having just single or two occupants.
This tale of housing horror comes from the USA where it is argued that the
price boom does not just cause serious issues for the younger generations but
is having an adverse impact on the economy as a whole.
Governments
are reluctant to do much because of the extent of the vested interests and are
by various means stoking it up to the apparent advantage of some and to gain
plaudits from the winners. The rich get
richer and to some extent at the direct expense of the poorest and by those I
means the lower income employed who have to pay the taxes.
In the UK
there is a suggestion that the Labour idea's on "mansion tax" had the
effect of pushing enough home owners to vote Tory, enough to make the critical
difference. At the same time it is said
that the incoming very rich regard our choice London homes as little better
than broom cupboards compared to the space they can buy elsewhere.
So there is
extensive work going on in the areas in question to create bigger and better
mansions for smaller and smaller numbers of people. On the other hand figures
suggest that down the market new properties tend to be smaller than in the past
and taking up less ground. The more you
pay the less you get.
There is the
question of migration. Necessarily, the
more that come in, the more space that will be wanted. Traditionally, higher rates of incomers in
the past led to reductions in space per head especially in the lower income
groups.
This may well
be happening in many areas, the appearance of what are essentially shanties in
some areas of London is no more that what usually happens. Also, in some districts there are now
increasing numbers of properties intensively occupied and often cheek by jowl
with those that are not.
What also
seems to be happening is that the urge to build and to increase use of existing
property is going ahead without much in the way of additional facilities. In my own area, the road space needed for
increasing traffic flows is not there, nor are the schools, nor other
educational facilities, much else and critically health provision.
Also, the
radical change in the shape and nature of property, its ownership and
management is not matched by any rebalancing or adjustments to tax structure
and impact. The mess that is local and
property taxation in the UK has a very long history and has been a political
no-go area too often.
In the past it
has led to the damage wreaked on what should have been the UK "Mittelstand"
and other sectors of the economy. It may
now be that soon the price will have to be paid on top of the existing
distortions to the economy generally.
When it might
hit is impossible to predict, but hit it will because there are already too
many faults in an ancient structure that has poor foundations.
While out walking in Derbyshire we see numerous modern mansions these days. We passed two yesterday near Matlock and another which is so big we could see it clearly from the other side of the valley.
ReplyDeleteI often read articles by a chap who has made a study of decayed or vanished Derbyshire mansions, but as far as I can see they are being replaced at quite a rate.